- Date
- July 10, 1996, 13:30 local (17:30 UTC)
- Place
- Hartford, CT
- Injuries
- 2 uninjured
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Phase of flight
- Landing
- Aircraft
- N1085WMooney M20M
- Weather
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Status
- Completed · report March 31, 1998
- Report
- Approved by Office Director
- FAA report
- 19960710016489A
- Case key
- 28077
From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.
On this page
Probable cause
the pilot's inadequate control of the airplane during the approach to landing/landing roll. A related factor is the pilot's inadequate remedial action (attempted go-around).
Sequence of events
NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.
Analysis
The pilot reported that the airplane was too fast on final approach to land, so he requested and received clearance to perform a 360-degree turn to slow the airplane before landing. When he flared the airplane for landing, it seemed to float. When he attempted to apply full throttle for a go-around, the throttle control would not go in. The airplane touched down more than halfway down the runway, and ran off the departure end of the runway where it collided with a fence. Postaccident examination revealed no evidence of preimpact mechanical anomaly. Flight control continuity was confirmed, and throttle, mixture, and propeller controls were examined, with no anomalies noted.
Factual narrative
On July 10, 1996, at about 1330 eastern daylight time (EDT), a Mooney M20M, N1085W, ran off the departure end of the runway, and collided with a fence after landing at Hartford-Brainard Airport, in Hartford, Connecticut. The pilot, and the one passenger reported no injuries. The airplane sustained substantial damage. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, and no flight plan was filed. The flight operated under 14 CFR Part 91, and originated from Lawrence G. Hanscom Field, in Bedford, Massachusetts, at approximately 1235 EDT.
The passenger of the accident aircraft stated that as the aircraft flew over the approach end of the intended landing runway, he thought that the airplane was somewhat higher above the ground than it should have been. He reported that when the pilot attempted to flare the aircraft for landing, it did not settle to the runway, "...rather that it seemed to float down the runway." The passenger stated that he looked "...down and to the left...and observed [the pilot] attempting to push the throttle in for full power... ." The passenger indicated that the power did not increase. The airplane touched down more than halfway down the runway, and veered to the right before it impacted a fence.
The pilot reported that when the airplane was about 2 miles out, he recognized that the airplane "...was not slowed down enough for the final approach." The pilot requested and received air traffic control (ATC) clearance to perform a 360 degree turn to the right and rejoin final approach at a slower airspeed. The pilot stated that he performed his final approach procedures, and slowed the airplane to 75-80 knots, but when the airplane passed over the "...dike at the end of 29...[it]...caught a strong updraft...[the airplane] floated, and with 1/3 of the runway used, I attempted to [apply] full throttle for a go around, however the throttle control would not go in." The pilot stated that he decided to land the airplane. After the airplane touched down the pilot "...steered the plane toward the longest open point of ground, which was a corner of the field to the right. The left wing struck a fence post, turning the plane around into the fence."
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Inspector stated that postaccident examination confirmed that the flight controls were capable of normal operation. The FAA Inspector reported that examination of the throttle, mixture and propeller controls established that the controls were capable of normal operation. There was no evidence of preimpact mechanical anomaly.
Aircraft
- Registration
- N1085W
- Reported as
- Mooney M20M
- Category
- Airplane
- Serial number
- 27-0043
- Engine
- Lycoming TIO-540-AFIA, 270 horsepower, reciprocating
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal · Part 91
- Registered owner
- Bandar K. Al-Faisal
- Airworthiness certificate
- Standard, Normal
- Departed
- BED · Bedford, MA
- Destination
- HFD · CT
- Airport
- HFD · Hartford-Brainard, runway 29, 2,315 × 71 ft, asphalt
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
Flight crew
As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.
- Role
- Pilot
- Age
- 44
- Certificate
- Private
- Airplane ratings
- Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 3, Valid Medical--w/ waivers/lim
- Seat
- Left
- Flight hours
- 381 total · 20 in this make and model · 286 as pilot in command · 43 in the last 90 days · 17 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours
Weather
- Conditions
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Wind
- 290° at 7 knots
- Visibility
- 15 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling
- 5,000 ft broken
- Temperature
- 79 °F, dew point 52 °F
- Altimeter
- 29.00 inHg
- Observed at
- HFD
FAA reports on this event · 1
The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.
Other investigations on N1085W · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.