MIA69D0479

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 150H · Santiago, St. Pierre & Miquelon · March 19, 1969

Accident · No injuriesClosed
Date
March 19, 1969
Place
Santiago, St. Pierre & Miquelon · SANTIAGO, Panama
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Takeoff
Aircraft
N23049Cessna 150H
Status
Completed · report July 2, 1969
Report
Brief approved by the director
Case key
186058

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

NTSB brief

NTSB’s brief of the accident, as it was printed: the coded facts, with the probable cause and factors.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FILE    DATE          LOCATION          AIRCRAFT DATA       INJURIES       FLIGHT                        PILOT DATA
                                                               F  S M/N     PURPOSE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6-0017  69/3/19    SANTIAGO,PANAMA     CESSNA 150H         CR-  0  0  1  INSTRUCTIONAL             STUDENT, AGE 26, 22 TOTAL
        TIME - 1045                    N23049              PX-  0  0  0  SOLO                      HOURS, ALL IN TYPE, NOT
                                       DAMAGE-SUBSTANTIAL  OT-  0  0  0                            INSTRUMENT RATED.
        NAME OF AIRPORT - SANTIAGO
        TYPE OF ACCIDENT                                         PHASE OF OPERATION
           GROUND-WATER LOOP-SWERVE                                 TAKEOFF: RUN
           COLLIDED WITH: TREES                                     TAKEOFF: RUN
        REMARKS- INVESTIGATION UNDER JURISDICTION OF GOVT OF PANAMA.

Aircraft

Registration
N23049
Reported as
Cessna 150H
Category
Airplane
Engine
reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Airport
Santiago

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.