- Date
- June 28, 2008, 18:15 local (22:15 UTC)
- Place
- Charlotte, NC
- Injuries
- 112 uninjured
- Phase of flight
- Pushback/towing
- Defining events
- Pushback/towing: Ground handling eventStanding: Ground handling event
- Weather
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Status
- Completed · report May 6, 2009
- Report
- Approved by Office Director
- Parties
- FAA/FSDO
- FAA report
- 20080628846359A
- Case key
- 68339
From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.
On this page
Probable cause
The tugdriver and wing walker's lack of communication and the tugdriver's failure to properly monitor the wing walker. Contributing to the accident was the lightning in the vicinity of the airport, which resulted in the ground crewmembers not wearing headsets.
The tugdriver and wing walker's lack of communication and the tugdriver's failure to properly monitor the wing walker. Contributing to the accident was the lightning in the vicinity of the airport, which resulted in the ground crewmembers not wearing headsets.
Findings · 6
NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.
N725PS · Bombardier CL-600-2C10
N228PS · Bombardier CL-600-2B19
Sequence of events
The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.
N725PS · Bombardier CL-600-2C10
N228PS · Bombardier CL-600-2B19
Analysis
A CRJ 200 had completed the pushback process and was waiting for taxi clearance. A CRJ 700 was being pushed back from another gate, with a wing walker stationed at the left wing. The wing walker was aware of the CRJ 200, and when the pushback commenced, he believed that the tugdriver was only going to pushback the airplane about 10 feet. As the tugdriver continued to push the airplane past 10 feet, the wing walker signaled the tugdriver to stop. Witnesses observed the wing walker signaling the tugdriver to stop as the tugdriver continued to push the airplane. The tail section of the CRJ 700 struck the tail section of the CRJ 200, which resulted in substantial damage to the empennages of both airplanes. Due to lightning in the vicinity of airport, ground crewmembers were not using headsets.
A CRJ 200 had completed the pushback process and was waiting for taxi clearance. A CRJ 700 was being pushed back from another gate, with a wing walker stationed at the left wing. The wing walker was aware of the CRJ 200, and when the pushback commenced, he believed that the tugdriver was only going to pushback the airplane about 10 feet. As the tugdriver continued to push the airplane past 10 feet, the wing walker signaled the tugdriver to stop. Witnesses observed the wing walker signaling the tugdriver to stop as the tugdriver continued to push the airplane. The tail section of the CRJ 700 struck the tail section of the CRJ 200, which resulted in substantial damage to the empennages of both airplanes. Due to lightning in the vicinity of airport, ground crewmembers were not using headsets.
Factual narrative
On June 28, 2008, about 1815 eastern daylight time, a Bombardier Inc. CL-600-2C10 (CRJ 700), N725PS, was being pushed back for taxi to takeoff, when it struck a standing Bombardier Inc. CL-600-2B19 (CRJ 200), N228PS, at the Charlotte-Douglas International Airport (CLT), Charlotte, North Carolina. Both airplanes were substantially damaged, and both flights were operated by PSA Airlines Inc., doing business as US Airways Express. There were no injuries to the 2 flight crewmembers, 2 flight attendants, and 60 passengers on board the CRJ 700, or the 2 flight crewmembers, 1 flight attendant, and 45 passengers on board the CRJ 200. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and instrument flight rules flight plans were filed for both flights, which were conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 121. According to a representative from PSA Airlines Inc., due to lightning in the vicinity of CLT, ground crewmembers were not utilizing headsets. The CRJ 200 had completed the pushback process from gate E21, and was waiting for taxi clearance. The CRJ 700 was parked at gate E12, when it was cleared for pushback by ramp control. A wing walker was stationed at the left wing, in plain sight of the tugdriver. The wing walker was aware of the CRJ 200, and when the pushback commenced, he believed that the tugdriver was only going to pushback the airplane about 10 feet, just enough to trigger the aircraft communication addressing and reporting system (ACARS) "out" time. As the tugdriver continued to push the airplane past 10 feet, the wing walker signaled the tugdriver to stop. He continued to attempt to alert the tugdriver; however, the tugdriver did not observe the wing walker before the tail section of the CRJ 700, struck the tail section of the CRJ 200. The empennages of both airplanes were substantially damaged. Two other ground crewmembers stated that they observed the wing walker signaling the tugdriver to stop as the tugdriver continued to push the airplane. One of the ground crewmembers, who was working at gate E14, ran toward the tugdriver and tried to get his attention. He stated that the tugdriver was focused on the cockpit of the airplane and was directing the starting of the airplane's No. 2 engine. The tugdriver stated that he began the pushback as normal and gave the flight crew the signal to start the No. 2 engine. He was not aware that anything was wrong until he observed the ground crewmember from gate E14.
On June 28, 2008, about 1815 eastern daylight time, a Bombardier Inc. CL-600-2C10 (CRJ 700), N725PS, was being pushed back for taxi to takeoff, when it struck a standing Bombardier Inc. CL-600-2B19 (CRJ 200), N228PS, at the Charlotte-Douglas International Airport (CLT), Charlotte, North Carolina. Both airplanes were substantially damaged, and both flights were operated by PSA Airlines Inc., doing business as US Airways Express. There were no injuries to the 2 flight crewmembers, 2 flight attendants, and 60 passengers on board the CRJ 700, or the 2 flight crewmembers, 1 flight attendant, and 45 passengers on board the CRJ 200. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and instrument flight rules flight plans were filed for both flights, which were conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 121. According to a representative from PSA Airlines Inc., due to lightning in the vicinity of CLT, ground crew members were not utilizing headsets. The CRJ 200 had completed the pushback process from gate E21, and was waiting for taxi clearance. The CRJ 700 was parked at gate E12, when it was cleared for pushback by ramp control. A wing walker was stationed at the left wing, in plain sight of the tug driver. The wing walker was aware of the CRJ 200, and when the pushback commenced, he believed that the tug driver was only going to pushback the airplane about 10 feet, just enough to trigger the aircraft communication addressing and reporting system (ACARS) "out" time. As the tug driver continued to push the airplane past 10 feet, the wing walker signaled the tug driver to stop. He continued to attempt to alert the tug driver; however, the tug driver did not observe the wing walker before the tail section of the CRJ 700, struck the tail section of the CRJ 200. The empennages of both airplanes were substantially damaged. Two other ground crew members stated that they observed the wing walker signaling the tug driver to stop as the tug driver continued to push the airplane. One of the ground crew members, who was working at gate E14 ran toward the tug driver and tried to get his attention. He stated that the tug driver was focused on the cockpit of the airplane and was directing the starting of the airplane's number 2 engine. The tug driver stated that he began the pushback as normal and gave the flight crew the signal to start the number two engine. He was not aware that anything was wrong until he observed the ground crew member from gate E14.
Aircraft · 2
- Registration
- N725PS
- Reported as
- Bombardier CL-600-2C10
- Category
- Airplane
- Serial number
- 10186
- Airframe hours
- 9,011
- Engines
- GE CF34-8C5B1, 13,790 lbs thrust, turbo fanGE CF34-8C5B1, 13,790 lbs thrust, turbo fan
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Part 121
- Operator
- PSA Airlines Inc., doing business as US Airways Express
- Registered owner
- Wells Fargo Bank Northwest NA Trustee
- Airworthiness certificate
- Standard, Transport; Standard, Normal
- Last inspection
- Continuous airworthiness · June 26, 2008
- Departed
- CLT · Charlotte, NC
- Destination
- IAD · Dulles, VA
- Flight plan
- IFR
- Airport
- CLT · Charlotte-Douglas
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
- Registration
- N228PS
- Reported as
- Bombardier CL-600-2B19
- Category
- Airplane
- Serial number
- 7897
- Airframe hours
- 10,544
- Engines
- GE CF34-3B1, 8,729 lbs thrust, turbo fanGE CF34-3B1, 8,729 lbs thrust, turbo fan
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Part 121
- Operator
- Psa Airlines Inc, doing business as US Airways Express
- Registered owner
- Wells Fargo Bank Northwest NA Trustee
- Airworthiness certificate
- Standard, Transport
- Last inspection
- Continuous airworthiness · June 26, 2008
- Departed
- CLT · Charlotte, NC
- Destination
- FAY · Fayetteville, NC
- Flight plan
- IFR
- Airport
- CLT · Charlotte-Douglas
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
Flight crew · 4
As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.
- Role
- Pilot, aircraft N725PS
- Age
- 30
- Injuries
- None
- Certificate
- Airline transport
- Airplane ratings
- Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
- Last flight review
- May 7, 2008
- Seat
- Left
- Flight hours
- 5,316 total · 2,393 as pilot in command · 226 in the last 90 days · 76 in the last 30 days · 5 in the last 24 hours
- Role
- Co-pilot, aircraft N725PS
- Age
- 31
- Injuries
- None
- Certificate
- Commercial
- Airplane ratings
- Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
- Last flight review
- January 19, 2008
- Seat
- Right
- Flight hours
- 177 total · 86 in the last 90 days · 46 in the last 30 days · 4 in the last 24 hours
- Role
- Pilot, aircraft N228PS
- Age
- 26
- Injuries
- None
- Certificate
- Airline transport
- Airplane ratings
- Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
- Last flight review
- March 23, 2008
- Seat
- Left
- Flight hours
- 1,595 total · 87 as pilot in command · 122 in the last 90 days · 25 in the last 30 days
- Role
- Co-pilot, aircraft N228PS
- Age
- 25
- Injuries
- None
- Certificate
- Commercial
- Airplane ratings
- Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 1, With waivers/limitations
- Last flight review
- November 2, 2007
- Seat
- Right
- Flight hours
- 430 total · 207 in the last 90 days · 46 in the last 30 days
Weather
- Conditions
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Wind
- 168° at 8 knots
- Visibility
- 10 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling
- 25,000 ft broken
- Temperature
- 77 °F, dew point 68 °F
- Altimeter
- 29.98 inHg
- Observed at
- CLT
FAA reports on this event · 1
The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.