- Date
- September 13, 1979
- Place
- Conrad, MT · CONRAD, MT
- Injuries
- 1 uninjured
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Phase of flight
- Landing
- Aircraft
- N2015SCessna 172
- Status
- Completed · report October 16, 1979
- Report
- Brief approved by the director
- Case key
- 133899
From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.
On this page
NTSB brief
NTSB’s brief of the accident, as it was printed: the coded facts, with the probable cause and factors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FILE DATE LOCATION AIRCRAFT DATA INJURIES FLIGHT PILOT DATA F S M/N PURPOSE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-1994 79/9/13 CONRAD,MT CESSNA 172 CR- 0 0 1 NONCOMMERCIAL PRIVATE, AGE 38, 257 TIME - 1330 N2015S PX- 0 0 0 PLEASURE/PERSONAL TRANSP TOTAL HOURS, 223 IN TYPE, DAMAGE-SUBSTANTIAL OT- 0 0 0 NOT INSTRUMENT RATED. NAME OF AIRPORT - CONRAD DEPARTURE POINT INTENDED DESTINATION HIGHWOOD,MT CONRAD,MT TYPE OF ACCIDENT PHASE OF OPERATION EVASIVE MANEUVER LANDING: ROLL GEAR COLLAPSED LANDING: ROLL PROBABLE CAUSE(S) PERSONNEL - OPERATIONAL SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL: DEFICIENCY,COMPANY MAINTAINED EQPMT,SERVICES,REGULATION PERSONNEL - MISCELLANEOUS-PERSONNEL: DRIVER OF VEHICLE MISCELLANEOUS - EVASIVE MANEUVER TO AVOID COLLISION FACTOR(S) PILOT IN COMMAND - EXERCISED POOR JUDGMENT MISCELLANEOUS ACTS,CONDITIONS - RUNWAY CLOSED MISCELLANEOUS ACTS,CONDITIONS - OVERLOAD FAILURE REMARKS- ARPT CLOSED DUE CONSTRUCTION,NOTAMED. TRUCK BACKED IN PATH OF ACFT,PLT SWERVED % HIT CULVERTS.
Aircraft
- Registration
- N2015S
- Reported as
- Cessna 172
- Category
- Airplane
- Engine
- reciprocating
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Airport
- Conrad
N2015SRegistration cancelled Sep 12, 2012 · Cessna T210LAirframe modelCessna T210LEngine modelContinental TSIO-520 series
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.