AD 98-18-12

Historical

Airworthiness directive · Fuel Pump · Textron Lycoming, AVCO AEIO-540-D4A5, AEIO-540-D4B5, AEIO-540-D4C5 and 249 more

Effective
September 28, 1998
Published
September 11, 1998 · 63 FR 48571–48573
Superseded by
AD2003-14-03
Models
AEIO-540-D4A5, AEIO-540-D4B5, AEIO-540-D4C5, AEIO-540-L1B5, AEIO-540-L1B5D, GO-435 and 246 more
Registered aircraft
26,673 matched by model
Product
Engine
Amendment
39-10728
Docket
97-ANE-50-AD
Issued as
Final rule; request for comments

Unofficial copy of the text in the FAA’s Dynamic Regulatory System. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed August 7, 2025.

On this page

Summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Textron Lycoming fuel injected reciprocating engines with certain Crane/Lear Romec "AN" rotary fuel pumps installed. This action requires initial and repetitive torque check inspections of pump relief valve attaching screws. In addition, if the torque remains within acceptable values after two inspections, the repetitive torque check inspections may be terminated. This amendment is prompted by reports of inflight engine fires caused by leaking rotary fuel pumps. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent rotary fuel pump leaks, which could result in an engine failure, engine fire, and damage to or loss of the aircraft.

The airworthiness directive

98-18-12 Textron Lycoming: Amendment 39-10728. Docket 97-ANE-50-AD. Applicability: Textron Lycoming IO-320, LIO-320, IO-360, HIO-360, TIO-360, LTIO-360, GO-435, GO-480, IGO-480-A1B6, IO-540, IGO-540, AEIO-540, HIO-540, TIO-540, LTIO-540, TIGO-541, IO-720, and TIO-720 fuel injected reciprocating engines, with Crane/Lear Romec "AN" rotary fuel pump model series, RG9080, RG9570, and RG17980 installed. These engines are installed on but not limited to fuel injected, reciprocating engine powered aircraft manufactured by Cessna, The New Piper, Inc., Mooney, Raytheon (Beech), Bellanca, Champion, Partenavia, Rockwell, Schweizer, Enstrom, Aerospatiale (SOCATA), Maule, Aero Commander, Helio, Hiller, and Pacific Aerospace Corp. Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent rotary fuel pump leaks, which could result in an engine failure, engine fire, and damage to or loss of the aircraft, accomplish the following: (a) Perform initial and repetitive torque check inspections of pump relief valve attaching screws in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Textron Lycoming Service Bulletin (SB) No. 529, dated December 1, 1997, as follows: (1) Within 10 hours time in service(TIS), or 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, perform the initial torque check inspection. If the torque does not meet the specifications in Textron Lycoming SB No. 529, dated December 1, 1997, tighten screws to the required torque in accordance with that SB. (2) Perform a follow-up torque check inspection after accumulating 50 hours TIS, or 6 months since the initial torque check inspection, whichever occurs first. If the torque does not meet the specification in Textron Lycoming SB No. 529, dated December 1, 1997, during this follow-up inspection, tighten screws to the required torque in accordance with that SB. (3) Continue the repetitive torque check inspections required by paragraph (a)(2) of this AD until: (i) The accumulation of 100 hours TIS since the initial inspection with the torque remaining within the SB specification for 50 hours TIS; or (ii) The torque meets the SB specification during the initial inspection and a subsequent inspection taking place at least 50 hours TIS later. (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office. Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, if any, may be obtained from the New York Aircraft Certification Office. (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (d) The actions required by this AD shall be done in accordance with the following Textron Lycoming SB:

Document No. Pages Date 529 1-6 December 1, 1997 Total Pages: 6.

This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Textron Lycoming, 652 Oliver St., Williamsport, PA 17701; telephone (717) 327-7080, fax (717) 327-7100. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. (e) This amendment becomes effective on September 28, 1998. 3rd Floor, Valley Stream, NY 11581-1200; telephone (516) 256-7505, fax (516) 568-2716.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

Supplementary information

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has received reports of three engine fires and six other fuel leakage events on certain Textron Lycoming fuel injected reciprocating engines with Crane/Lear Romec "AN" rotary fuel pumps, model series RG9080, RG9570, and RG17980, installed. The investigations revealed that the rotary fuel pumps were leaking past the fuel pump relief valve gasket. The fuel pump valve cover screws had become loose, possibly due to gasket compression set (permanent deformation) or screw yield. If the torque loosens due to gasket compression set, once the torque is reset, it may not loosen again. Therefore, this AD allows for termination of repetitive torque checks if the torque meets specifications during two follow-up checks after being reset. This condition, if not corrected, could result in rotary fuel pump leaks, which could result in an engine failure, engine fire, and damage to or loss of the aircraft. The FAA has reviewedand approved the technical contents of Textron Lycoming Service Bulletin (SB) No. 529, dated December 1, 1997, that describes procedures for torque check inspections of pump relief valve attaching screws. Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other engines of the same type design, this AD is being issued to prevent rotary fuel pump leaks. This AD requires initial and repetitive torque check inspections of pump relief valve attaching screws. In addition, if the torque remains within acceptable values after two inspections, the repetitive torque check inspections may be terminated. The manufacturer is developing a modification to the rotary fuel pump with a more resilient gasket material that does not exhibit these permanent set characteristics, so future rulemaking may be forthcoming requiring this modification as a terminating action to the repetitive inspections required if the torque does not remain within the values stated by the SB. The actions are required to be accomplished in accordance with the SB described previously. Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days. Comments Invited Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption "ADDRESSES." All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of thecomments received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed. Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: "Comments to Docket Number 97-ANE-50-AD." The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter. The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe condition in aircraft, and is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 R 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES." List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 39.13 [Amended] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Affected TCDS · 10

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 26,673

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Piper10,248 aircraft
  • Cessna4,814 aircraft
  • Mooney2,194 aircraft
  • Textron1,174 aircraft
  • Beech587 aircraft
  • Other makers3,0637,656 aircraft
By year built
19292026
Registered aircraft by year built: 24,044 aircraft
19291
19301
19371
19391
19401
19415
19421
19435
19443
19455
194619
194712
19489
19492
195014
195112
19522
19538
195410
195526
195631
195712
195820
195922
196047
196143
196265
1963183
1964448
1965526
1966782
1967761
1968577
1969699
1970265
1971378
1972495
1973641
1974634
1975672
1976910
1977899
1978969
1979519
1980331
1981350
1982200
1983136
1984127
198579
198663
198767
198883
1989130
1990112
1991113
199295
1993126
1994117
1995154
1996163
1997263
1998568
1999622
2000633
2001512
2002472
2003572
2004689
2005795
2006454
2007323
2008352
2009187
2010180
2011176
2012215
2013145
2014211
2015176
2016157
2017172
2018208
2019288
2020317
2021286
2022346
2023412
2024415
2025434
2026282

2,629 with no year recorded

By model

See all 161 models

Aircraft

See all 26,673 aircraft

NTSB investigations that cite this AD · 3

Their narratives or probable cause name AD 98-18-12, often to say whether the aircraft complied with it.