What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Narrative: pilot departed rwy 28L, VFR, reported engine failure approx. 1 mile west of airport. ATC cleared pilot to land any runway. Pilot landed rwy 05R without incident. Pilot subsequently "restarted" engine (aft engine) and departed on IFR clearance to crq. Pilot claimed, during interview with inspectors t. park, d. johnson, and s. vargo, of San Diego FSDO, on 02/16/95, that engine quit as airplane rotated for takeoff. Cause of engine failure was being investigated by company mechanics (a&p's) during interview. Subsequent investigation by inspector park disclosed four pilot witnesses who claim pilot began his takeoff with the aft engine shut down, or inoperative. privacy data omitted This report did not involve a NMAC or a pilot deviation.
As the FAA filed it
NARRATIVE: PILOT DEPARTED RWY 28L, VFR, REPORTED ENGINE FAILURE APPROX. 1 MILE WEST OF AIRPORT. ATC CLEARED PILOT TO LAND ANY RUNWAY. PILOT LANDED RWY 05R WITHOUT INCIDENT. PILOT SUBSEQUENTLY "RESTARTED" ENGINE (AFT ENGINE) AND DEPARTED ON IFR CLEARANCE TO CRQ. PILOT CLAIMED, DURING INTERVIEW WITH INSPECTORS T. PARK, D. JOHNSON, AND S. VARGO, OF SAN DIEGO FSDO, ON 02/16/95, THAT ENGINE QUIT AS AIRPLANE ROTATED FOR TAKEOFF. CAUSE OF ENGINE FAILURE WAS BEING INVESTIGATED BY COMPANY MECHANICS (A&P'S) DURING INTERVIEW. SUBSEQUENT INVESTIGATION BY INSPECTOR PARK DISCLOSED FOUR PILOT WITNESSES WHO CLAIM PILOT BEGAN HIS TAKEOFF WITH THE AFT ENGINE SHUT DOWN, OR INOPERATIVE. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ THIS REPORT DID NOT INVOLVE A NMAC OR A PILOT DEVIATION.
Other reports on N12NA · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.