What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Acft landed hard and the right main landing gear collapsed, Fresno, CA. (.4) after practicing maneuvers and takeoffs and landings at an alternate airport, the dual instructional flight was returning to base to terminate the flight. In the pattern the flight instructor simulated an engine failure, with the student recovering and making a full stop landing. On the landing rollout, the aircraft veered to the right. The instructor applied full left rudder, with the aircraft continuing to the right. The instructor brought the aircraft to a stop on the runway, then requested and received permission from the tower to exit the aircraft and check the landing gear. The instructor noted that the right main landing gear was broken. Upon attempting to re-enter the aircraft, the right main landing gear collapsed, and the right wing struck the ground. The instructor and student submitted written statements that stated the landing was not hard. In their interviews; however, they both stated that the landing was hard and the student stated that she was not sure if the aircraft had been properly aligned with the runway. The aircraft and landing gear mechanism were examined at the accident location. The right landing gear had separated from the wing with the front and rear attach fittings broken, exhibiting outboard loading. The landing gear collapsed towards the fuselage. No further mechanical anomalies were noted. (-23) damage to the aircraft indicates a hard landing with lateral load imposed on right main landing gear. Statements from the instructor and student reflect a conflict of what happened during landing at kfat.
As the FAA filed it
ACFT LANDED HARD AND THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED, FRESNO, CA. (.4) AFTER PRACTICING MANEUVERS AND TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS AT AN ALTERNATE AIRPORT, THE DUAL INSTRUCTIONAL FLIGHT WAS RETURNING TO BASE TO TERMINATE THE FLIGHT. IN THE PATTERN THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR SIMULATED AN ENGINE FAILURE, WITH THE STUDENT RECOVERING AND MAKING A FULL STOP LANDING. ON THE LANDING ROLLOUT, THE AIRCRAFT VEERED TO THE RIGHT. THE INSTRUCTOR APPLIED FULL LEFT RUDDER, WITH THE AIRCRAFT CONTINUING TO THE RIGHT. THE INSTRUCTOR BROUGHT THE AIRCRAFT TO A STOP ON THE RUNWAY, THEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED PERMISSION FROM THE TOWER TO EXIT THE AIRCRAFT AND CHECK THE LANDING GEAR. THE INSTRUCTOR NOTED THAT THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR WAS BROKEN. UPON ATTEMPTING TO RE-ENTER THE AIRCRAFT, THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED, AND THE RIGHT WING STRUCK THE GROUND. THE INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT SUBMITTED WRITTEN STATEMENTS THAT STATED THE LANDING WAS NOT HARD. IN THEIR INTERVIEWS; HOWEVER, THEY BOTH STATED THAT THE LANDING WAS HARD AND THE STUDENT STATED THAT SHE WAS NOT SURE IF THE AIRCRAFT HAD BEEN PROPERLY ALIGNED WITH THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT AND LANDING GEAR MECHANISM WERE EXAMINED AT THE ACCIDENT LOCATION. THE RIGHT LANDING GEAR HAD SEPARATED FROM THE WING WITH THE FRONT AND REAR ATTACH FITTINGS BROKEN, EXHIBITING OUTBOARD LOADING. THE LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED TOWARDS THE FUSELAGE. NO FURTHER MECHANICAL ANOMALIES WERE NOTED. (-23) DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT INDICATES A HARD LANDING WITH LATERAL LOAD IMPOSED ON RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR. STATEMENTS FROM THE INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT REFLECT A CONFLICT OF WHAT HAPPENED DURING LANDING AT KFAT.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N2153B · 4
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.