19980520011259A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA-44-180 · Fresno, CA · May 20, 1998

Date
May 20, 1998 · 17:15 local
Place
Fresno, CA
Airport
Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N2153B
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX98LA176
Reported as
Piper PA44180
Reported engine
Lycoming O360*
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
1,221 total149 in this make and model9 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Acft landed hard and the right main landing gear collapsed, Fresno, CA. (.4) after practicing maneuvers and takeoffs and landings at an alternate airport, the dual instructional flight was returning to base to terminate the flight. In the pattern the flight instructor simulated an engine failure, with the student recovering and making a full stop landing. On the landing rollout, the aircraft veered to the right. The instructor applied full left rudder, with the aircraft continuing to the right. The instructor brought the aircraft to a stop on the runway, then requested and received permission from the tower to exit the aircraft and check the landing gear. The instructor noted that the right main landing gear was broken. Upon attempting to re-enter the aircraft, the right main landing gear collapsed, and the right wing struck the ground. The instructor and student submitted written statements that stated the landing was not hard. In their interviews; however, they both stated that the landing was hard and the student stated that she was not sure if the aircraft had been properly aligned with the runway. The aircraft and landing gear mechanism were examined at the accident location. The right landing gear had separated from the wing with the front and rear attach fittings broken, exhibiting outboard loading. The landing gear collapsed towards the fuselage. No further mechanical anomalies were noted. (-23) damage to the aircraft indicates a hard landing with lateral load imposed on right main landing gear. Statements from the instructor and student reflect a conflict of what happened during landing at kfat.

As the FAA filed it

ACFT LANDED HARD AND THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED, FRESNO, CA. (.4) AFTER PRACTICING MANEUVERS AND TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS AT AN ALTERNATE AIRPORT, THE DUAL INSTRUCTIONAL FLIGHT WAS RETURNING TO BASE TO TERMINATE THE FLIGHT. IN THE PATTERN THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR SIMULATED AN ENGINE FAILURE, WITH THE STUDENT RECOVERING AND MAKING A FULL STOP LANDING. ON THE LANDING ROLLOUT, THE AIRCRAFT VEERED TO THE RIGHT. THE INSTRUCTOR APPLIED FULL LEFT RUDDER, WITH THE AIRCRAFT CONTINUING TO THE RIGHT. THE INSTRUCTOR BROUGHT THE AIRCRAFT TO A STOP ON THE RUNWAY, THEN REQUESTED AND RECEIVED PERMISSION FROM THE TOWER TO EXIT THE AIRCRAFT AND CHECK THE LANDING GEAR. THE INSTRUCTOR NOTED THAT THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR WAS BROKEN. UPON ATTEMPTING TO RE-ENTER THE AIRCRAFT, THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED, AND THE RIGHT WING STRUCK THE GROUND. THE INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT SUBMITTED WRITTEN STATEMENTS THAT STATED THE LANDING WAS NOT HARD. IN THEIR INTERVIEWS; HOWEVER, THEY BOTH STATED THAT THE LANDING WAS HARD AND THE STUDENT STATED THAT SHE WAS NOT SURE IF THE AIRCRAFT HAD BEEN PROPERLY ALIGNED WITH THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT AND LANDING GEAR MECHANISM WERE EXAMINED AT THE ACCIDENT LOCATION. THE RIGHT LANDING GEAR HAD SEPARATED FROM THE WING WITH THE FRONT AND REAR ATTACH FITTINGS BROKEN, EXHIBITING OUTBOARD LOADING. THE LANDING GEAR COLLAPSED TOWARDS THE FUSELAGE. NO FURTHER MECHANICAL ANOMALIES WERE NOTED. (-23) DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT INDICATES A HARD LANDING WITH LATERAL LOAD IMPOSED ON RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR. STATEMENTS FROM THE INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT REFLECT A CONFLICT OF WHAT HAPPENED DURING LANDING AT KFAT.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N2153B · 4

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.