What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Aircraft experienced sudden loss of power while climbing out from touch and go landing at Mobile Airport (1A20). Aircraft was successfully landed in open desert approximately 3 n.m. s.e. of airport. (.4) during climb out the engine began shaking, rattling, and losing power. The flight instructor took the controls and performed an emergency off-airport landing. While on rollout the aircraft sustained substantial damage to the leading edges and lower surfaces of both wings. The engine had been previously inspected iaw tcm 99-3, which required the removal of the no. 1 and 3 cylinders. Upon reassembly of the cylinders, it was necessary to reinstall three snap rings on the crankshaft counterweights at the no. 2 and 5 cheeks. An inspection of he no. 5 cheek revealed that these three snap rings were not fully seated. The signatures on the crankshaft and counterweight were consistent with a counterweight striking the crankshaft. This can only happen if the counterweight pin is not in place. A revision to tcm mandatory service bulletin 99-3C, published on July 27, 1999, now requires that the gap between the snap ring ears be measured to insure that they are properl y seated during reassembly.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) AIRCRAFT EXPERIENCED SUDDEN LOSS OF POWER WHILE CLIMBING OUT FROM TOUCH AND GO LANDING AT MOBILE AIRPORT (1A20). AIRCRAFT WAS SUCCESSFULLY LANDED IN OPEN DESERT APPROXIMATELY 3 N.M. S.E. OF AIRPORT. (.4) DURING CLIMB OUT THE ENGINE BEGAN SHAKING, RATTLING, AND LOSING POWER. THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR TOOK THE CONTROLS AND PERFORMED AN EMERGENCY OFF-AIRPORT LANDING. WHILE ON ROLLOUT THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE LEADING EDGES AND LOWER SURFACES OF BOTH WINGS. THE ENGINE HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY INSPECTED IAW TCM 99-3, WHICH REQUIRED THE REMOVAL OF THE NO. 1 AND 3 CYLINDERS. UPON REASSEMBLY OF THE CYLINDERS, IT WAS NECESSARY TO REINSTALL THREE SNAP RINGS ON THE CRANKSHAFT COUNTERWEIGHTS AT THE NO. 2 AND 5 CHEEKS. AN INSPECTION OF HE NO. 5 CHEEK REVEALED THAT THESE THREE SNAP RINGS WERE NOT FULLY SEATED. THE SIGNATURES ON THE CRANKSHAFT AND COUNTERWEIGHT WERE CONSISTENT WITH A COUNTERWEIGHT STRIKING THE CRANKSHAFT. THIS CAN ONLY HAPPEN IF THE COUNTERWEIGHT PIN IS NOT IN PLACE. A REVISION TO TCM MANDATORY SERVICE BULLETIN 99-3C, PUBLISHED ON JULY 27, 1999, NOW REQUIRES THAT THE GAP BETWEEN THE SNAP RING EARS BE MEASURED TO INSURE THAT THEY ARE PROPERL Y SEATED DURING REASSEMBLY.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N1565A · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.