What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-19)On March 23, 2001, about 1550 hours mountain standard time, a Cessna 305A, N5188G, owned and operated by the front seated pilot, ground looped during landing rollout on runway 04 at the Winslow-lindbergh regional airport, Winslow, Arizona. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The airplane was substantially damaged. Neither the front seated pilot nor the rear seated certified flight instructor were injured. The instructional flight was performed under 14 CFR part 91, and it originated from needles, California, about 1.4 hours earlier. The flight instructor (CFI) reported that the front seated student held a private pilot certificate, but he had not received an endorsement to fly conventional gear airplanes. The private pilot had just purchased the airplane, and was in the process of flying it to his annapolis, Maryland, home with the aid of the CFI. The flight instructor reported that the private pilot's landing was normal. However, when the pilot applied the toe brakes, his left shoe (size 14) slipped off the pedal and became jammed next to the console. The instructor stated that he yelled at the pilot to release the brake, but to no avail . As the airplane veered off the runway and control was lost, the right landing gear axle broke, and the right wing impacted the ground. (-23)please see pilots statement enclosed. He states that the private rated(tail wheel student) in the front seat was drifting left on landing at Winslow and when the CFI went to take control, the students left foot became jammed between tubing along the left floor well area and the rudder pedal, not allowing the CFI to recover before the aircraft ground looped causing substantial damage to the right wingtip and right main wheel assembly. (.4) the student made a normal landing with his CFI in the conventional gear airplane that the student had recently purchased. Seconds after touchdown the airplane started turning slowly to the left. The CFI applied rudder pressure for the correction, but was unable to move the right rudder pedal more than 3 or 4 inches. The left turn continued, and the CFI shouted for the student to "get off the controls." The CFI reported that he pushed "very hard" on the right rudder in an effort to stop the turn to the left. However, the right rudder would not move farther regardless of the force applied. The turn to the left continued to accelerate. Directional control was subsequently lost, and as the airplane ground looped the right wing tip touched the ground and the right wheel separated from the strut at the axle. The investigation revealed that the student's shoe size is 14, he weighs about 250 pounds, and he is 6 feet 6 inches tall. During rollout the student's left foot had slipped off the rudder pedal. It had become jammed between the top portion of the pedal and the console, thus restricting the pedal's movement. This control interference resulted in the cfi's inability to take corrective action to preclude the loss of control.
As the FAA filed it
(-19)ON MARCH 23, 2001, ABOUT 1550 HOURS MOUNTAIN STANDARD TIME, A CESSNA 305A, N5188G, OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE FRONT SEATED PILOT, GROUND LOOPED DURING LANDING ROLLOUT ON RUNWAY 04 AT THE WINSLOW-LINDBERGH REGIONAL AIRPORT, WINSLOW, ARIZONA. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED AND NO FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED. THE AIRPLANE WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED. NEITHER THE FRONT SEATED PILOT NOR THE REAR SEATED CERTIFIED FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR WERE INJURED. THE INSTRUCTIONAL FLIGHT WAS PERFORMED UNDER 14 CFR PART 91, AND IT ORIGINATED FROM NEEDLES, CALIFORNIA, ABOUT 1.4 HOURS EARLIER. THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR (CFI) REPORTED THAT THE FRONT SEATED STUDENT HELD A PRIVATE PILOT CERTIFICATE, BUT HE HAD NOT RECEIVED AN ENDORSEMENT TO FLY CONVENTIONAL GEAR AIRPLANES. THE PRIVATE PILOT HAD JUST PURCHASED THE AIRPLANE, AND WAS IN THE PROCESS OF FLYING IT TO HIS ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND, HOME WITH THE AID OF THE CFI. THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR REPORTED THAT THE PRIVATE PILOT'S LANDING WAS NORMAL. HOWEVER, WHEN THE PILOT APPLIED THE TOE BRAKES, HIS LEFT SHOE (SIZE 14) SLIPPED OFF THE PEDAL AND BECAME JAMMED NEXT TO THE CONSOLE. THE INSTRUCTOR STATED THAT HE YELLED AT THE PILOT TO RELEASE THE BRAKE, BUT TO NO AVAIL . AS THE AIRPLANE VEERED OFF THE RUNWAY AND CONTROL WAS LOST, THE RIGHT LANDING GEAR AXLE BROKE, AND THE RIGHT WING IMPACTED THE GROUND. (-23)PLEASE SEE PILOTS STATEMENT ENCLOSED. HE STATES THAT THE PRIVATE RATED(TAIL WHEEL STUDENT) IN THE FRONT SEAT WAS DRIFTING LEFT ON LANDING AT WINSLOW AND WHEN THE CFI WENT TO TAKE CONTROL, THE STUDENTS LEFT FOOT BECAME JAMMED BETWEEN TUBING ALONG THE LEFT FLOOR WELL AREA AND THE RUDDER PEDAL, NOT ALLOWING THE CFI TO RECOVER BEFORE THE AIRCRAFT GROUND LOOPED CAUSING SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE RIGHT WINGTIP AND RIGHT MAIN WHEEL ASSEMBLY. (.4) THE STUDENT MADE A NORMAL LANDING WITH HIS CFI IN THE CONVENTIONAL GEAR AIRPLANE THAT THE STUDENT HAD RECENTLY PURCHASED. SECONDS AFTER TOUCHDOWN THE AIRPLANE STARTED TURNING SLOWLY TO THE LEFT. THE CFI APPLIED RUDDER PRESSURE FOR THE CORRECTION, BUT WAS UNABLE TO MOVE THE RIGHT RUDDER PEDAL MORE THAN 3 OR 4 INCHES. THE LEFT TURN CONTINUED, AND THE CFI SHOUTED FOR THE STUDENT TO "GET OFF THE CONTROLS." THE CFI REPORTED THAT HE PUSHED "VERY HARD" ON THE RIGHT RUDDER IN AN EFFORT TO STOP THE TURN TO THE LEFT. HOWEVER, THE RIGHT RUDDER WOULD NOT MOVE FARTHER REGARDLESS OF THE FORCE APPLIED. THE TURN TO THE LEFT CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE. DIRECTIONAL CONTROL WAS SUBSEQUENTLY LOST, AND AS THE AIRPLANE GROUND LOOPED THE RIGHT WING TIP TOUCHED THE GROUND AND THE RIGHT WHEEL SEPARATED FROM THE STRUT AT THE AXLE. THE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE STUDENT'S SHOE SIZE IS 14, HE WEIGHS ABOUT 250 POUNDS, AND HE IS 6 FEET 6 INCHES TALL. DURING ROLLOUT THE STUDENT'S LEFT FOOT HAD SLIPPED OFF THE RUDDER PEDAL. IT HAD BECOME JAMMED BETWEEN THE TOP PORTION OF THE PEDAL AND THE CONSOLE, THUS RESTRICTING THE PEDAL'S MOVEMENT. THIS CONTROL INTERFERENCE RESULTED IN THE CFI'S INABILITY TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION TO PRECLUDE THE LOSS OF CONTROL.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N5188G · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.