What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) On 04/09/2004 at 7:30 cdst, a Cessna 182 had a mid-air collision with a Cessna 172. The Cessna 182 sustained minor damage and the Cessna 172 sustained substantial damage. Each aircraft made uneventful landings. The pilots did not report any injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. Neither pilot had filed a flight plan. On 04/10/04 the pilot of the Cessna 182 was interviewed and the aircraft inspected for damage. The aircraft received damage to the firewall and the nose gear fairing. The pilot stated he was performing a steep turn of 45-degree bank angle. He stated that he was heading approximately south after a 360-degree turn. He stated that he was clearing as he turned. He stated that as he began rolling out of the turn he saw another aircraft in his 2-O'CLOCK position. He stated that it was below him, heading about 310-degrees. He stated he did not have time to attempt to avoid the collision. He then indicated he checked the flight controls, the engine instruments and the status of the other aircraft and returned to his home field. Damage to the aircraft indicates the nose wheel of the 182 contacted the right side of the 172 vertical stabilizer and rudder. The damage to the 172 is approximately the top 8 inches of the vertical stabilizer and rudder missing and a bend in the upper portion of the vertical stabilizer and rudder. The damage to the 182 is to the firewall and fairing that surrounds the nose gear.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) ON 04/09/2004 AT 7:30 CDST, A CESSNA 182 HAD A MID-AIR COLLISION WITH A CESSNA 172. THE CESSNA 182 SUSTAINED MINOR DAMAGE AND THE CESSNA 172 SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. EACH AIRCRAFT MADE UNEVENTFUL LANDINGS. THE PILOTS DID NOT REPORT ANY INJURIES. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT. NEITHER PILOT HAD FILED A FLIGHT PLAN. ON 04/10/04 THE PILOT OF THE CESSNA 182 WAS INTERVIEWED AND THE AIRCRAFT INSPECTED FOR DAMAGE. THE AIRCRAFT RECEIVED DAMAGE TO THE FIREWALL AND THE NOSE GEAR FAIRING. THE PILOT STATED HE WAS PERFORMING A STEEP TURN OF 45-DEGREE BANK ANGLE. HE STATED THAT HE WAS HEADING APPROXIMATELY SOUTH AFTER A 360-DEGREE TURN. HE STATED THAT HE WAS CLEARING AS HE TURNED. HE STATED THAT AS HE BEGAN ROLLING OUT OF THE TURN HE SAW ANOTHER AIRCRAFT IN HIS 2-O'CLOCK POSITION. HE STATED THAT IT WAS BELOW HIM, HEADING ABOUT 310-DEGREES. HE STATED HE DID NOT HAVE TIME TO ATTEMPT TO AVOID THE COLLISION. HE THEN INDICATED HE CHECKED THE FLIGHT CONTROLS, THE ENGINE INSTRUMENTS AND THE STATUS OF THE OTHER AIRCRAFT AND RETURNED TO HIS HOME FIELD. DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT INDICATES THE NOSE WHEEL OF THE 182 CONTACTED THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE 172 VERTICAL STABILIZER AND RUDDER. THE DAMAGE TO THE 172 IS APPROXIMATELY THE TOP 8 INCHES OF THE VERTICAL STABILIZER AND RUDDER MISSING AND A BEND IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE VERTICAL STABILIZER AND RUDDER. THE DAMAGE TO THE 182 IS TO THE FIREWALL AND FAIRING THAT SURROUNDS THE NOSE GEAR.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other aircraft in the event · 1
Each aircraft in a collision has its own report.