What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Aircraft was completing ILS approach to runway 13. Aircraft impacted runway (right main landing gear) approximately seventeen feet to the left of centerline approx one thousand feet from threshold. Left main gear contacted runway twenty-three feet beyond the point where right main gear contacted. Nosewheel contacted runway forty-eight feet beyond point where right main gear contacted runway. These observations based on distinct skidmarks on runway that are consistent with damage. Aircraft appeared to have been in nose high, right wing low attitude at point of first contact, suggesting unstable attitude and uncontrolled sink rate. Weather at the time was one hundred feet overcast with one quarter mile visibility. This was the second approach as first approach resulted in missed approach. Pilot stated that he had landed normally, but lost control and became airborne after he believed the left main landing gear tire had blown. This assertion could not be verified.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) AIRCRAFT WAS COMPLETING ILS APPROACH TO RUNWAY 13. AIRCRAFT IMPACTED RUNWAY (RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR) APPROXIMATELY SEVENTEEN FEET TO THE LEFT OF CENTERLINE APPROX ONE THOUSAND FEET FROM THRESHOLD. LEFT MAIN GEAR CONTACTED RUNWAY TWENTY-THREE FEET BEYOND THE POINT WHERE RIGHT MAIN GEAR CONTACTED. NOSEWHEEL CONTACTED RUNWAY FORTY-EIGHT FEET BEYOND POINT WHERE RIGHT MAIN GEAR CONTACTED RUNWAY. THESE OBSERVATIONS BASED ON DISTINCT SKIDMARKS ON RUNWAY THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH DAMAGE. AIRCRAFT APPEARED TO HAVE BEEN IN NOSE HIGH, RIGHT WING LOW ATTITUDE AT POINT OF FIRST CONTACT, SUGGESTING UNSTABLE ATTITUDE AND UNCONTROLLED SINK RATE. WEATHER AT THE TIME WAS ONE HUNDRED FEET OVERCAST WITH ONE QUARTER MILE VISIBILITY. THIS WAS THE SECOND APPROACH AS FIRST APPROACH RESULTED IN MISSED APPROACH. PILOT STATED THAT HE HAD LANDED NORMALLY, BUT LOST CONTROL AND BECAME AIRBORNE AFTER HE BELIEVED THE LEFT MAIN LANDING GEAR TIRE HAD BLOWN. THIS ASSERTION COULD NOT BE VERIFIED.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.