What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) On June 25, 2006, about 0900 pacific daylight time a Maule M-7-235C, N209Z, veered off the runway and nosed over during landing at Brackett field, laverne, California. The pilot privacy data omitted was operating the airplane under provisions of 14 CFR part 91. The private pilot and one passenger were not injured; the airplane sustained substantial damage. The local personal flight departed Brackett field about 0854. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The pilot reported that after touchdown on the runway, he lost directional control of the airplane. He stated (per NTSB report) "I was not succeeding in controlling it, so I let it run off of the runway and it flipped over after the prop struck the ground." The pilot stated that the airplane and engine had no mechanical failures that would have precluded normal operation.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) ON JUNE 25, 2006, ABOUT 0900 PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME A MAULE M-7-235C, N209Z, VEERED OFF THE RUNWAY AND NOSED OVER DURING LANDING AT BRACKETT FIELD, LAVERNE, CALIFORNIA. THE PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMIT^ WAS OPERATING THE AIRPLANE UNDER PROVISIONS OF 14 CFR PART 91. THE PRIVATE PILOT AND ONE PASSENGER WERE NOT INJURED; THE AIRPLANE SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE LOCAL PERSONAL FLIGHT DEPARTED BRACKETT FIELD ABOUT 0854. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED, AND NO FLIGHT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED. THE PILOT REPORTED THAT AFTER TOUCHDOWN ON THE RUNWAY, HE LOST DIRECTIONAL CONTROL OF THE AIRPLANE. HE STATED (PER NTSB REPORT) "I WAS NOT SUCCEEDING IN CONTROLLING IT, SO I LET IT RUN OFF OF THE RUNWAY AND IT FLIPPED OVER AFTER THE PROP STRUCK THE GROUND." THE PILOT STATED THAT THE AIRPLANE AND ENGINE HAD NO MECHANICAL FAILURES THAT WOULD HAVE PRECLUDED NORMAL OPERATION.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.