20080105009679A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Piper PA-31-350 · Kodiak, AK · January 5, 2008

Date
January 5, 2008 · 13:45 local
Place
Kodiak, AK
Airport
Kodiak
Phase of flight
Forced/Precautionary Landing
Operating rules
Air taxi and commuter (Part 135)
Operator
S4EA
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N509FN
NTSB investigation
NTSBANC08MA038
Reported as
Piper PA31350
Reported engine
Lycoming TIO540J2BD
People aboard
6
Fatal injuries
6
Pilot’s flight hours
9,320 total361 in this make and model168 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Taking off on runway 36 the aircraft's front baggage door came partially open at lift off or shortly thereafter. According to the survivor sitting in the #6 seat, as the pilot initialed a right turn, the baggage door went to the full open position and the aircraft immediately rolled or tucked sharply, crashing into the water. (-23 amendment) note: the possibility the pilot failed in his attempt to secure the baggage door correctly is obvious. However the question is, "were there extenuating circumstances that contributed to this failure, when securing thie particular type baggage door?" See item #4, FAA nine responsibilities. Conclusion: the pilot apparently failed to properly secure the forward baggage door, which allowed it to open during takeoff. According to 14 CFR 91.3 (a) the pilot in command is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft. During the course of this investigation numerous anomalies were uncovered and corrective recommendations are currently being consider by the FAA and the manufacture.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) TAKING OFF ON RUNWAY 36 THE AIRCRAFT'S FRONT BAGGAGE DOOR CAME PARTIALLY OPEN AT LIFT OFF OR SHORTLY THEREAFTER. ACCORDING TO THE SURVIVOR SITTING IN THE #6 SEAT, AS THE PILOT INITIALED A RIGHT TURN, THE BAGGAGE DOOR WENT TO THE FULL OPEN POSITION AND THE AIRCRAFT IMMEDIATELY ROLLED OR TUCKED SHARPLY, CRASHING INTO THE WATER. (-23 AMENDMENT) NOTE: THE POSSIBILITY THE PILOT FAILED IN HIS ATTEMPT TO SECURE THE BAGGAGE DOOR CORRECTLY IS OBVIOUS. HOWEVER THE QUESTION IS, "WERE THERE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THIS FAILURE, WHEN SECURING THIE PARTICULAR TYPE BAGGAGE DOOR?" SEE ITEM #4, FAA NINE RESPONSIBILITIES. CONCLUSION: THE PILOT APPARENTLY FAILED TO PROPERLY SECURE THE FORWARD BAGGAGE DOOR, WHICH ALLOWED IT TO OPEN DURING TAKEOFF. ACCORDING TO 14 CFR 91.3 (A) THE PILOT IN COMMAND IS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR, AND IS THE FINAL AUTHORITY AS TO, THE OPERATION OF THAT AIRCRAFT. DURING THE COURSE OF THIS INVESTIGATION NUMEROUS ANOMALIES WERE UNCOVERED AND CORRECTIVE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE CURRENTLY BEING CONSIDER BY THE FAA AND THE MANUFACTURE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.