20080408837969I

Incident · Substantial damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 177RG · Redding, CA · April 8, 2008

Date
April 8, 2008 · 11:30 local
Place
Redding, CA
Airport
Redding Municipal
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Operator
ZD7A
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N1925Q
NTSB investigation
NTSBSEA08CA106
Reported as
Cessna 177RG
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
10,000 total0 in this make and model0 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The flight instructor reported that on the first landing the pilot-rated student failed to extend the landing gear. The instructor further reported that he didn't notice that the landing gear was in the up position on approach to landing. Additionally, the pilot-rated student had set the panifold pressute at 15 inches, while the landing gear warning horn is set to activate at 13 inches of manifold pressure. The flight instructor also stated that the landing checklist was not accomplished. The airplaned landed with all three landing gear in the retracted position, which resulted in substantial damage. The nationatl transportation safety board determiines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: the failure of the pilot under instruction to lower the landing gear, the failure of both pilots to follow the landing checklist, and the flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the flight.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR REPORTED THAT ON THE FIRST LANDING THE PILOT-RATED STUDENT FAILED TO EXTEND THE LANDING GEAR. THE INSTRUCTOR FURTHER REPORTED THAT HE DIDN'T NOTICE THAT THE LANDING GEAR WAS IN THE UP POSITION ON APPROACH TO LANDING. ADDITIONALLY, THE PILOT-RATED STUDENT HAD SET THE PANIFOLD PRESSUTE AT 15 INCHES, WHILE THE LANDING GEAR WARNING HORN IS SET TO ACTIVATE AT 13 INCHES OF MANIFOLD PRESSURE. THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR ALSO STATED THAT THE LANDING CHECKLIST WAS NOT ACCOMPLISHED. THE AIRPLANED LANDED WITH ALL THREE LANDING GEAR IN THE RETRACTED POSITION, WHICH RESULTED IN SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE NATIONATL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD DETERMIINES THE PROBABLE CAUSE(S) OF THIS ACCIDENT AS FOLLOWS: THE FAILURE OF THE PILOT UNDER INSTRUCTION TO LOWER THE LANDING GEAR, THE FAILURE OF BOTH PILOTS TO FOLLOW THE LANDING CHECKLIST, AND THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR'S INADEQUATE SUPERVISION OF THE FLIGHT.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N1925Q · 4

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.