20110208002259I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 210N · Columbia, MO · February 8, 2011

Date
February 8, 2011 · 14:50 local
Place
Columbia, MO
Phase of flight
Landing: Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N92MP
NTSB investigation
NTSBCEN11IA179
Reported as
Cessna 210N
Reported engine
Teledyne Continental IO-520-L17
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Private pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
468 total177 in this make and model56 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

According to the PIC, he was sequenced number 2 for landing by cou ATCT and was instructed to report a 2-mile final. The other acft was ahead and on a left base. He became preoccupied looking for traffic to ensure adequate spacing and did not refer to his landing checklist. Just prior to touching down, he realized his landing gear was retracted and added power to extend the flare. He extended the landing gear and completed the landing; however, the propeller blades and a section of lower fuselage contacted the runway. He stated that the landing gear warning system did not sound.

As the FAA filed it

ACCORDING TO THE PIC, HE WAS SEQUENCED NUMBER 2 FOR LANDING BY COU ATCT AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO REPORT A 2-MILE FINAL. THE OTHER ACFT WAS AHEAD AND ON A LEFT BASE. HE BECAME PREOCCUPIED LOOKING FOR TRAFFIC TO ENSURE ADEQUATE SPACING AND DID NOT REFER TO HIS LANDING CHECKLIST. JUST PRIOR TO TOUCHING DOWN, HE REALIZED HIS LANDING GEAR WAS RETRACTED AND ADDED POWER TO EXTEND THE FLARE. HE EXTENDED THE LANDING GEAR AND COMPLETED THE LANDING; HOWEVER, THE PROPELLER BLADES AND A SECTION OF LOWER FUSELAGE CONTACTED THE RUNWAY. HE STATED THAT THE LANDING GEAR WARNING SYSTEM DID NOT SOUND.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N92MP · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.