From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Aircraft was landing on rwy 29 when it bounced and the pilot opted to go-around. Aircraft continued on to second landing on rwy 29 where it landed without the gear extended. Aircraft came to rest on its belly with no injuries to the pilot or passenger aboard. In discussion with the pilot he stated he was shook up by the first landing and was worried about his speed, and simply forgot to extend his gear for the second landing.
Aircraft sustained damage to the prop tips, belly skins, and nose gear doors. The flaps were not extended and there was no damage to them or the rest of the aircraft. Otherwise no visible substantial damage done to the aircraft.
As the FAA filed it
AIRCRAFT WAS LANDING ON RWY 29 WHEN IT BOUNCED AND THE PILOT OPTED TO GO-AROUND. AIRCRAFT CONTINUED ON TO SECOND LANDING ON RWY 29 WHERE IT LANDED WITHOUT THE GEAR EXTENDED. AIRCRAFT CAME TO REST ON ITS BELLY WITH NO INJURIES TO THE PILOT OR PASSENGER ABOARD. IN DISCUSSION WITH THE PILOT HE STATED HE WAS SHOOK UP BY THE FIRST LANDING AND WAS WORRIED ABOUT HIS SPEED, AND SIMPLY FORGOT TO EXTEND HIS GEAR FOR THE SECOND LANDING.
AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED DAMAGE TO THE PROP TIPS, BELLY SKINS, AND NOSE GEAR DOORS. THE FLAPS WERE NOT EXTENDED AND THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THEM OR THE REST OF THE AIRCRAFT. OTHERWISE NO VISIBLE SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE DONE TO THE AIRCRAFT.
Other reports on N201SV · 2
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.