What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On Sunday, July 31, 2022, privacy data omitted the pilot in command (PIC), ofprivacy data omitted a Cessna 182, operated a flight under visual flight rules (VFR) from wittman regional airport (kosh) to Joliet Regional Airport (kjot). Due to the wind direction, the PIC chose to land on runway 22. Runway 22 is a turf (grass) runway. When the PIC was attempting to land the aircraft at 11:58 am central time, the nose gear of the aircraft struck the ground first. The aircraft then bounced and the nose gear struck the ground. This occurred for a total of three times, with each bounce being progressively higher than the previous. The aircraft eventually landed on the turf runway.
The PIC did consider a go-around, but did not perform one.
The PIC taxied the aircraft to the ramp so that it may be fueled. The PIC provided instructions to fuel the aircraft to the lineman working at the time. The PIC attempted to open the left door to exit the aircraft. This door would not open. The PIC exited the aircraft from the door on the right side of the aircraft. After exiting the aircraft, the PIC performed an external inspection which revealed skin crumpling on the left side of the aircraft and the tips of the propeller bent backwards.
There were no injuries.
The aircraft sustained substantial damage to the forward bulkhead/firewall, and nose section stringers and formers.
During inspection of the aircraft, the elevator was shown have a significant amount of movement with the gust lock secured in the control column.
As the FAA filed it
ON SUNDAY, JULY 31, 2022, ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ THE PILOT IN COMMAND (PIC), OF^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ A CESSNA 182, OPERATED A FLIGHT UNDER VISUAL FLIGHT RULES (VFR) FROM WITTMAN REGIONAL AIRPORT (KOSH) TO JOLIET REGIONAL AIRPORT (KJOT). DUE TO THE WIND DIRECTION, THE PIC CHOSE TO LAND ON RUNWAY 22. RUNWAY 22 IS A TURF (GRASS) RUNWAY. WHEN THE PIC WAS ATTEMPTING TO LAND THE AIRCRAFT AT 11:58 AM CENTRAL TIME, THE NOSE GEAR OF THE AIRCRAFT STRUCK THE GROUND FIRST. THE AIRCRAFT THEN BOUNCED AND THE NOSE GEAR STRUCK THE GROUND. THIS OCCURRED FOR A TOTAL OF THREE TIMES, WITH EACH BOUNCE BEING PROGRESSIVELY HIGHER THAN THE PREVIOUS. THE AIRCRAFT EVENTUALLY LANDED ON THE TURF RUNWAY.
THE PIC DID CONSIDER A GO-AROUND, BUT DID NOT PERFORM ONE.
THE PIC TAXIED THE AIRCRAFT TO THE RAMP SO THAT IT MAY BE FUELED. THE PIC PROVIDED INSTRUCTIONS TO FUEL THE AIRCRAFT TO THE LINEMAN WORKING AT THE TIME. THE PIC ATTEMPTED TO OPEN THE LEFT DOOR TO EXIT THE AIRCRAFT. THIS DOOR WOULD NOT OPEN. THE PIC EXITED THE AIRCRAFT FROM THE DOOR ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE AIRCRAFT. AFTER EXITING THE AIRCRAFT, THE PIC PERFORMED AN EXTERNAL INSPECTION WHICH REVEALED SKIN CRUMPLING ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE AIRCRAFT AND THE TIPS OF THE PROPELLER BENT BACKWARDS.
THERE WERE NO INJURIES.
THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE FORWARD BULKHEAD/FIREWALL, AND NOSE SECTION STRINGERS AND FORMERS.
DURING INSPECTION OF THE AIRCRAFT, THE ELEVATOR WAS SHOWN HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF MOVEMENT WITH THE GUST LOCK SECURED IN THE CONTROL COLUMN.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N3519Y · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.