CEN20CA152

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172 · Enid, OK · April 16, 2020

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
April 16, 2020, 17:35 local (22:35 UTC)
Place
Enid, OK
Injuries
3 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N737RRCessna 172
Defining event
Landing: Loss of control on ground
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report September 21, 2020
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Central Region
Parties
FAA
FAA report
20200416003909A
Case key
101181

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The flight instructor's delayed remedial action during a power-off approach and go-around in gusting wind conditions, which resulted in a hard landing, loss of directional control, and a runway excursion onto a field.

Findings · 4

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Action: delayed actionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Instructor/check pilotCessna 172N: 19 casesAll aircraft: 894 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: directional controlAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedCessna 172N: 82 casesAll aircraft: 3,958 casesProbable cause
Wind: gustsEnvironmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena · Effect on operationCessna 172N: 28 casesAll aircraft: 1,199 casesProbable cause
TerrainEnvironmental issues › Physical environment · Effect on operationCessna 172N: 2 casesAll aircraft: 267 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

According to the flight instructor, during a training flight, he instructed the student pilot to perform a simulated power-off approach to a private turf airstrip. He briefed the student to execute a go-around upon reaching 100 ft above ground level. Upon reaching this altitude with the airplane configured with full flaps and the airspeed about 60 knots, the instructor told the student to go around. However, the airplane continued to descend, the airspeed decreased to about 45 knots, and the airplane veered left, at which point the instructor applied full power and raised the flaps, but the airplane "touched down firmly" about midfield off the left side of the runway and continued to veer left onto a field. The instructor visually inspected the airplane from his right seat and decided to take off to the south and return to the home airport. Once at the home airport, examination of the airplane revealed that the left wing had sustained substantial damage.

Factual narrative

According to the flight instructor, during a training flight, he instructed the student pilot to perform a simulated power-off approach to a private turf airstrip. The student pilot was briefed to execute a go-around upon reaching 100 ft above the airstrip surface. About 100 ft above the airstrip, with the airplane configured with full flaps and the airspeed about 60 kts, the student was instructed to go-around. However, the airplane continued to descend, and the airspeed decreased to about 45 kts. The instructor applied full power and raised the flaps, but the airplane "touched down firmly" about mid-field off the left side of the runway and subsequently veered further left into a wheat field. The instructor visually inspected the airplane from his right seat and decided to takeoff to the south, returning to the home airport. A postlanding inspection revealed the left wing had sustained substantial damage. About the time of the accident, the local wind was from 180° at 28 kts and gusting to 35 kts.

Aircraft

Registration
N737RR
Reported as
Cessna 172 (N)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
17269620
Built
1977
Airframe hours
8,950.4
Engine
Lycoming O-320-H2AD, 160 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
Aero Club Of Enid Inc
Registered owner
Aero Club Of Enid Inc
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · February 13, 2020
Departed
END · Enid, OK
Destination
WDG · Enid, OK
Airport
1OK · Fairmont Field, runway 17, 2,540 × 65 ft, grass/turf
Equipment
Electronic flight bag or handheld device, ADS-B

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
47
Injuries
None
Certificates
Airline transport, Flight instructor
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
September 18, 2019
Seat
Right
Restraint
Lap only
Flight hours
5,704 total · 4 in this make and model · 4,722 as pilot in command · 3 in the last 90 days · 3 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours
Role
Student pilot
Age
18
Injuries
None
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
9.1 total · 9.1 in this make and model · 1.7 in the last 90 days · 1.7 in the last 30 days · 0.6 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
180° at 28 knots, gusting 35
Visibility
10 statute miles
Temperature
73 °F, dew point 48 °F
Altimeter
29.82 inHg
Observed at
KWDG, 6 nm away

Docket · 2

The files NTSB released with the investigation on June 8, 2020, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 3.9 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.