ERA14CA150

NTSB accident investigation · Piper PA-28-140 · Salisbury, NC · March 8, 2014

Accident · Serious injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
March 8, 2014, 12:00 local (17:00 UTC)
Place
Salisbury, NC
Injuries
1 serious, 1 minor
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N4335TPiper PA-28-140
Defining event
Landing-flare/touchdown: Aircraft wake turb encounter
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report July 30, 2014
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FAA/FSDO
FAA report
20140308015669A
Case key
88895

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The flight instructor's decision to continue the landing in close proximity to a landing helicopter, resulting in an encounter with rotor vortices, loss of airplane control, and collision with terrain.

Findings · 4

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Performance/control parameters: directional controlAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedPiper PA-28-140: 40 casesAll aircraft: 3,958 casesProbable cause
Info processing/decision: decision making/judgmentPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Instructor/check pilotPiper PA-28-140: 43 casesAll aircraft: 3,098 casesProbable cause
Turbulence: wake turbulenceEnvironmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena · Decision related to conditionPiper PA-28-140: 1 caseAll aircraft: 47 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: aircraft controlPersonnel issues › Task performance · Not specifiedPiper PA-28-140: 103 casesAll aircraft: 9,295 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

At the time of the accident, simultaneous operations were being conducted at the airport. Airplanes were in left traffic for landing on runway 20, and military helicopters were in right traffic landing to a midfield helipad on the west (right) side of the runway. According to the flight instructor (CFI) in the accident airplane, the student pilot completed three touch-and-go landings and proceeded around the pattern for a fourth landing. During the landing the airplane approached the runway as a helicopter "suddenly lifted to a hover." Several witness statements and security video revealed that the 2,150-pound airplane followed behind an airplane that landed on the runway, and passed abeam an 18,000-pound Army utility helicopter on final approach to the helipad, before it banked sharply to the right and impacted terrain. Post-accident examination of the airplane by an FAA inspector revealed partial separation of the right wing and substantial damage to the fuselage. The CFI reported there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. According to the FAA's Aeronautical Information Manual, section 7-3-7: In a slow hover taxi or stationary hover near the surface, helicopter main rotor(s) generate down wash producing high velocity outwash vortices to a distance approximately three times the diameter of the rotor. When rotor downwash hits the surface, the resulting outwash vortices have behavioral characteristics similar to wing tip vortices produced by fixed wing aircraft. However, the vortex circulation is outward, upward, around, and away from the main rotor(s) in all directions. Pilots of small aircraft should avoid operating within three rotor diameters of any helicopter in a slow hover taxi or stationary hover. In forward flight, departing or landing helicopters produce a pair of strong, high-speed trailing vortices similar to wing tip vortices of larger fixed wing aircraft. Pilots of small aircraft should use caution when operating behind or crossing behind landing and departing helicopters.

Factual narrative

At the time of the accident, simultaneous operations were being conducted at the airport. Airplanes were in left traffic for landing on runway 20, and military helicopters were in right traffic landing to a midfield helipad on the west (right) side of the runway. According to the flight instructor (CFI) in the accident airplane, the student pilot completed three touch-and-go landings and proceeded around the pattern for a fourth landing. During the landing the airplane approached the runway as a helicopter "suddenly lifted to a hover." Several witness statements and security video revealed that the 2,150-pound airplane followed behind an airplane that landed on the runway, and passed abeam an 18,000-pound Army utility helicopter on final approach to the helipad, before it banked sharply to the right and impacted terrain. Post-accident examination of the airplane by an FAA inspector revealed partial separation of the right wing and substantial damage to the fuselage. The CFI reported there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. According to the FAA's Aeronautical Information Manual, section 7-3-7: In a slow hover taxi or stationary hover near the surface, helicopter main rotor(s) generate down wash producing high velocity outwash vortices to a distance approximately three times the diameter of the rotor. When rotor downwash hits the surface, the resulting outwash vortices have behavioral characteristics similar to wing tip vortices produced by fixed wing aircraft. However, the vortex circulation is outward, upward, around, and away from the main rotor(s) in all directions. Pilots of small aircraft should avoid operating within three rotor diameters of any helicopter in a slow hover taxi or stationary hover. In forward flight, departing or landing helicopters produce a pair of strong, high-speed trailing vortices similar to wing tip vortices of larger fixed wing aircraft. Pilots of small aircraft should use caution when operating behind or crossing behind landing and departing helicopters.

Aircraft

Registration
N4335T
Reported as
Piper PA-28-140
Category
Airplane
Serial number
28-7225149
Built
1971
Airframe hours
7,395
Engine
Lycoming 0-320 SERIES, 160 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
Julep Arbor Flying LLC, doing business as Alpha One Air Service, LLC
Registered owner
Julep Arbor Flying LLC
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal; Standard, Utility
Last inspection
Annual · October 13, 2013 · 68 hours before
Departed
RUQ · Salisbury, NC
Destination
RUQ · Salisbury, NC
Airport
RUQ · Rowan County Airport, runway 20, 5,501 × 100 ft, asphalt
Equipment
Stall warning system

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Flight instructor
Age
46
Injuries
None
Certificates
Flight instructor, Private, Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1
Last flight review
March 11, 2013
Seat
Right
Restraint
Lap only
Flight hours
1,350 total · 145 in this make and model · 1,264 as pilot in command · 167 in the last 90 days · 53 in the last 30 days · 2 in the last 24 hours
Role
Student pilot
Age
32
Injuries
Serious
Certificate
Student
Medical
Class 3
Seat
Left
Restraint
Lap only
Flight hours
28 total · 28 in this make and model

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
210° at 7 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
63 °F, dew point 43 °F
Altimeter
30.05 inHg
Observed at
RUQ

Docket · 5

The files NTSB released with the investigation on July 8, 2014, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 4.1 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.