LAX96FA080

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 152 · Compton, CA · December 26, 1995

Accident · Minor injuriesField investigationFinal report
Date
December 26, 1995, 12:22 local (20:22 UTC)
Place
Compton, CA
Injuries
2 minor
Damage
Destroyed
Phase of flight
Initial climb
Aircraft
N6110QCessna 152
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report January 8, 1997
Report
Approved by Office Director
FAA report
19951226047819A
Case key
29247

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The NTSB’s determination of the probable cause, and any contributing factors.

a push rod failed from fatigue as a result of longitudinal stress corrosion cracking.

Analysis

The instructor experienced a sudden reduction in engine rpm during climb out. After checking the engine and electrical systems, he took the controls and made a forced landing to a dry flood control canal. His attempts to advance the throttle resulted in a further loss of power. During the last portion of the approach he saw utility lines and attempted to avoid them but the aircraft struck an overhead cable. Witnesses heard popping sounds and saw smoke trailing the aircraft. An examination of the engine revealed a broken exhaust push rod. An examination found the push rod failed due to the manufacturing process in which it was artificially aged. This process made the push rod susceptible to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) with a lower stress threshold. The ASM handbook states that the preferred method is to maintain the material at the aging temperature for a longer period of time. The interference pins that are inserted in the ends of the push rod most likely produced hoop stress at a level sufficient to initiate SCC once the push rod is exposed to an environment of humid and/or salty air. SCC most likely began after manufacture, but before the push rod was placed into service during a period in which it was exposed to adverse environmental conditions.

Factual narrative

The factual narrative1,282 words

History of flight

On December 26, 1995, at 1222 hours Pacific standard time, a Cessna 152, N6110Q, collided with utility lines and crashed during a forced landing while on initial climb from the Compton, California, airport. The aircraft was destroyed; however, the instructor and his student received only minor injuries. The aircraft was being operated as an instructional flight by Jack's Aircraft when the accident occurred. The flight originated in Long Beach, California, at 1145. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan had been filed.

The instructor and his student were on climb out from runway 7R at the Compton airport when the engine power dropped to about 1,300 rpm. The instructor reacted by checking the engine controls and electrical switches which included the application of carburetor heat. When this failed to correct or identify the problem, he told his student that he was taking the controls. With his altitude below 400 feet, the pilot opted for a forced landing area immediately ahead of the aircraft.

The instructor selected a dry, concrete lined, flood control canal and established the aircraft on a straight-in approach. At approximately 40 to 50 feet agl, the pilot saw utility lines stretched along a bridge which crossed his approach path. He attempted to duck under them but the aircraft struck the lowest strand, an overhead TV cable. The pilot estimated his airspeed as about 70 knots when the aircraft struck the cable, which was about 8 to 9 feet above the adjacent bridge roadway.

After striking the cable, the aircraft continued into the canal striking the bottom and east embankment. The aircraft remained upright throughout and came to rest on a north-northwesterly heading. After coming to rest the instructor noticed fuel leaking from the right wing. He turned off the master and magneto switches and assisted his student out and away from the aircraft.

The pilot stated that, during the emergency, any attempts to advance the throttle resulted in a further loss of power. He estimated the engine was producing about 1,000 rpm just prior to striking the TV cable.

Witnesses to the accident reported hearing popping sounds and seeing smoke trailing the aircraft as it passed overhead. They reported that the aircraft struck and became entangled in an overhead line. The aircraft spun around as the aircraft stretched the cable whose opposite end had wrapped around a utility pole. They observed the aircraft striking the side of the canal as it slid to a stop. Upon obtaining a closer view they noticed that there were two occupants in the aircraft and ran to help them.

Personnel information

The pilot is a certificated commercial pilot and flight instructor. The student pilot had not soloed in this make and model aircraft.

Aircraft information

According to available, the aircraft accumulated a total of 8,764 flight hours. After an inspection of the aircraft and engine logbooks, FAA airworthiness inspectors found the aircraft had not been in an airworthy condition at the time of the accident. Although the aircraft was being operated for flight instruction for hire, the last required annual inspection expired on September 30, 1995.

The maintenance records included an STC for automotive fuel; however, there was no logbook entry authorizing automobile fuel. The required placards indicating fuel capacity were missing from each fuel tank. (A copy of the FAA form 337 is appended to this report.)

No weight and balance form existed for the aircraft's current equipment configuration. The aircraft was being operated with an unapproved Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH).

Maintenance records showed an engine mount had been replaced on April 4, 1995, but the required FAA form 337, which according to the logbook had been completed, was not included with the maintenance records.

The last seat rail inspection, which is required every 100 hours by Airworthiness Directive (AD) 87-20-03R2, was performed on April 3, 1990, when the aircraft had a total of 4,918.7 flight hours. Since then, the operator performed four inspections on the aircraft: July 21, 1994, August 31, 1994, September 6, 1994, and April 3, 1995, covering 397.1 flight hours. The maintenance records did not reflect a list of applicable and recurring AD's showing the status of each one.

According to the engine logbook, the aircraft's engine had been overhauled but a description of the work performed was not provided. A mandatory service bulletin from the engine manufacturer dated March 31, 1992, requires that all exhaust valves be replaced with current exhaust valves at overhaul. There was no reference to this bulletin in either the aircraft or engine records. (A copy of the service bulletin is appended to this report.)

Prior to the accident flight the aircraft had been refueled with 15.4 gallons of 80/87 octane aviation fuel by Airflite Inc.'s No. 2 refueling truck. After the accident fuel samples were taken from both the truck and the aircraft. (Excerpts from Airflite Inc.'s refueling log are appended to this report.)

Wreckage and impact information

The aircraft landed in a drainage canal about .3 miles southeast of the departure end of runway 7R. An on-scene examination revealed that the TV cable was wrapped around the propeller hub. The propeller did not show any evidence of leading edge damage, scratches, gouges or bending, nor did the spinner, which was crushed longitudinally, show any rotational scratches or scoring.

The engine tachometer meter read 7,042.1 hours at the accident site. The instructor recorded a start time of 7,041.6 at the beginning of the rental period.

The center anchor points for both front seat lap belts were found pulled loose from their mounted positions.

Both fuel tanks were about 3/4 full. The fuel was blue in color and had the odor of aviation fuel. A leak was evident from a broken fuel line from the right fuel tank near the right front door post. All the fuel lines were clear and unobstructed except for a broken right fuel line which was allowing fuel to pool under the aircraft and then to trickle toward the center of the channel. The fuel selector indicator was found in the "both" position.

The air induction box and the exhaust system were clear and unobstructed. The carburetor was attached to the engine manifold. The interior of the gascolator was clean, but showed the presence of evaporated water distillates. Throttle and mixture control continuity was established between the carburetor and the cockpit.

The carburetor was removed and disassembled. The fuel in the bowl was checked with water finding paste without result. The main discharge nozzle was open and unobstructed. The accelerator pumped fuel when actuated by hand and the plunger displayed flexibility. The fuel bowl inlet screen was clean and in place. The metal floats were set to move between the 5/8 inch down and 3/16 inch up limits. The one-piece venturi was in place; however, the mixture control arm was found bent and separated. The carburetor bowl gasket showed evidence of leaking with stains on the exterior of the bowl. The throttle plate shaft was loose in its bore with axial and radial play noted. The carburetor heat control was located in the air intake box and was found in the open (on) position.

The right and left magneto were securely mounted and sparked all four cylinders when the crankshaft was hand rotated. The left impulse coupler could be heard clicking during crankshaft rotation. Timing was found set at 20 degrees by means of a timing light as the crankshaft was hand rotated.

The top and bottom spark plugs were removed and examined. They contained visible lead deposits (clinkers) around the electrodes. According to the Champion Aviation Check-A-Plug chart, some plugs exhibited evidence of exposure to high operating temperatures.

The engi

Sequence of events

NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.

Loss of engine power(partial) - mech failure/malfTakeoff - initial climb
Engine assembly,push rod - fatigueCause
Forced landingEmergency landing after takeoff
Terrain condition - residential area
In flight collision with objectEmergency landing after takeoff
Object - wire,static
In flight collision with terrain/waterDescent - uncontrolled

Aircraft

Registration
N6110Q
Reported as
Cessna 152
Category
Airplane
Serial number
15285135
Airframe hours
8,764
Engine
Lycoming O-235-L2C, 110 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Registered owner
Jack Bouge
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Utility
Last inspection
100 hour · April 3, 1995 · 311 hours before
Departed
CPM
Destination
LGB · Long Beach, CA

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
27
Certificates
Flight instructor, Commercial
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, Valid Medical--no waivers/lim.
Seat
Right
Flight hours
905 total · 400 in this make and model · 750 as pilot in command · 76 in the last 90 days · 13 in the last 30 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
30° at 4 knots
Visibility
100 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Altimeter
30.00 inHg
Observed at
HHR

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.