AD 2013-15-07

Airworthiness directive · Communications · Boeing 787-8

Effective
July 26, 2013
Published
July 26, 2013 · 78 FR 45054–45055
Issued
July 23, 2013
Model
787-8
Data sheet
TCDST00021SE
Registered aircraft
75 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Large airplane
ATA chapter
23 · Communications
Amendment
39-17523
Docket
FAA-2013-0628
Project
2013-NM-132-AD
Issued as
Final rule; request for comments

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 2013-18110. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.

On this page

Summary

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes. This AD requires either removal or inspection of the Honeywell fixed emergency locator transmitter (ELT), and corrective action if necessary. This AD was prompted by a report of a fire involving a Honeywell fixed ELT. We are issuing this AD to prevent a fire in the aft crown of the airplane, or to detect and correct discrepancies within the ELT that could cause such a fire.

The airworthiness directive

2013-15-07 the Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17523; Docket No. FAA-2013-0628; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-132-AD.

(a) Effective Date

PDF page 2

This AD is effective on July 26, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

PDF page 2

None.

(c) Applicability

PDF page 2

This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8 airplanes, certificated in any category, line numbers 7 through 9 inclusive, 23, 24, 27, 29, 31, 33 through 35 inclusive, 37, 38, 40 through 42 inclusive, 44 through 72 inclusive, 74 through 78 inclusive, 80, 82 through 84 inclusive, 86, 87, 89, 92, 94 through 99 inclusive, 101, 102, 108, and 111.

(d) Subject

PDF page 2

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 23, Communications.

(e) Unsafe Condition

PDF page 2

This AD was prompted by a report of a fire involving the Honeywell fixed emergency locator transmitter (ELT). We are issuing this AD to prevent a fire in the aft crown of the airplane, or to detect and correct discrepancies within the ELT that could cause such a fire.

(f) Compliance

PDF page 2

Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.

(g) Honeywell Fixed ELT Removal or Inspection

PDF page 2

Within 10 days after the effective date of this AD, do the actions specified in either paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD.

(1) Remove the Honeywell fixed ELT using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.

(2) Inspect the Honeywell fixed ELT for discrepancies, and do all applicable corrective actions before further flight, using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

PDF page 2

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in the Related Information section of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office.

(i) Related Information

PDF page 2

For more information about this AD, contact Kenneth Fairhurst, Senior Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6466; fax: 425-917-6590; email: Kenneth.Fairhurst@faa.gov.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

PDF page 2

None.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 1

This AD is effective on July 26, 2013.

We must receive comments on this AD by September 9, 2013.

AddressesPage 1

You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Fax: 202-493-2251.

• Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For further information contactPage 1

Kenneth Fairhurst, Senior Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6466; fax: 425-917-6590; email: Kenneth.Fairhurst@faa.gov.

DiscussionPage 1

We have received a report of a fire involving the Honeywell fixed emergency locator transmitter (ELT) on a Model 787-8 airplane. The investigation indicates that the ELT may have initiated the event. Discrepancies within the ELT, if not corrected, could cause a fire in the aft crown of the airplane.

FAA's DeterminationPage 1

We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

AD RequirementsPage 1

This AD requires either removing the Honeywell fixed ELT, or inspecting the ELT (for discrepancies associated with the ELT, ELT battery, and associated wiring), and doing corrective action if necessary, in accordance with a method approved by the FAA.

The applicability of this AD is limited to in-service airplanes, which have been delivered with Honeywell fixed ELTs having part number 1152682-2. Future production airplanes will be addressed prior to delivery.

We recognize that various civil aviation authorities (CAA) have different operational requirements regarding the use of ELTs. While the United States does not require a fixed ELT to be installed for operation, operation of an airplane without an ELT in a particular country's airspace may require coordination with that country's CAA.

Interim actionPage 1

This AD is considered to be interim action. Because the fire occurred on a Model 787-8 airplane, required actions in this AD are focused on Honeywell fixed ELTs installed on that model. However, we acknowledge that ELTs are installed on various other aircraft; therefore, continued investigation is required. Once final action has been identified, we might consider further rulemaking.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective DatePage 1

An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because discrepancies within the Honeywell fixed ELT could cause a fire in the aft crown of the airplane. Therefore, we find that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Comments invitedPage 1

This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number FAA-2013-0628 and Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-132-AD at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of those comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this AD.

Costs of CompliancePage 1

We estimate that this AD affects 6 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

Estimated Costs
ActionLabor costParts costCost per productCost on U.S. operators
Removal or inspection1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85$0$85$510

We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This RulemakingPage 2

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. “Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs” describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: “General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory findingsPage 2

This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

(1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866,

(2) Is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Adoption of the AmendmentPage 2

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

Adoption of the amendmentPage 2

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 75

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Boeing75 aircraft
By year built
20102023
Registered aircraft by year built: 73 aircraft
20102
20126
20135
201411
201519
20167
20175
20181
20203
20211
20229
20234

2 with no year recorded

By model

Aircraft

See all 75 aircraft