19960312005789A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 152 · Baxley, GA · March 12, 1996

Date
March 12, 1996 · 16:30 local
Place
Baxley, GA
Airport
Baxley Municipal Airport
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N105AT
NTSB investigation
NTSBATL96LA064
Reported as
Cessna 152
Reported engine
Lycoming O235*
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
173 total143 in this make and model12 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(.19) On March 12, 1996, at 1630 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 152, N105AT, was substantially damaged following a loss of control and nose over during landing at the Baxley Municipal Airport in Baxley, Georgia. No injuries were incurred by the private pilot or his passenger in the accident. The aircraft was being operated under the provisions of title 14 CFR part 91 by the pilot. Visual meteorological conditions existed at the time of the accident, and no flight plan had been filed for the personal flight. The flight departed st. petersburg, Florida, at about 1500. The pilot stated that during the first landing attempt, he felt and heard the nose gear collapse, as the airplane touched down on the runway. At this point the pilot executed a go-around and established a traffic pattern for runway 26. While establishing the approach, the pilot realized that the nose gear had separated and the left rudder pedal was stuck on the floor, and he had no rudder control. On the second landing attempt he shut down the engine and the propeller stopped horizontally. The pilot held the nose off as long as possible. He stated that when the nose wheel touched down, the aircraft veered off the right side of the runway, and nosed over in the sod area next to the runway. (.4) according to the pilot, during the flare to touchdown phase of the approach, the airplane dropped onto the runway. As the airplane touched down, the pilot felt and heard the nose gear assembly collapse. After the touchdown, the pilot applied power and executed a go-around. While the pilot maneuvered for the second approach, he noted that the left rudder pedal was stuck on the floor and he did not have total rudder control. After the landing, the pilot held the nose off the runway as long as possible. When the nose section touched down, the airplane veered off the runway, and nosed over in the sod area next to the runway. Examination of the airplane failed to disclose a mechanical problem, nor did the pilot report a mechanical problem. According to the fixed base operator, the winds were shifting between 300 and 010 degrees as the pilot attempted the first landing.

As the FAA filed it

(.19) ON MARCH 12, 1996, AT 1630 EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, A CESSNA 152, N105AT, WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED FOLLOWING A LOSS OF CONTROL AND NOSE OVER DURING LANDING AT THE BAXLEY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT IN BAXLEY, GEORGIA. NO INJURIES WERE INCURRED BY THE PRIVATE PILOT OR HIS PASSENGER IN THE ACCIDENT. THE AIRCRAFT WAS BEING OPERATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 14 CFR PART 91 BY THE PILOT. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS EXISTED AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT, AND NO FLIGHT PLAN HAD BEEN FILED FOR THE PERSONAL FLIGHT. THE FLIGHT DEPARTED ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA, AT ABOUT 1500. THE PILOT STATED THAT DURING THE FIRST LANDING ATTEMPT, HE FELT AND HEARD THE NOSE GEAR COLLAPSE, AS THE AIRPLANE TOUCHED DOWN ON THE RUNWAY. AT THIS POINT THE PILOT EXECUTED A GO-AROUND AND ESTABLISHED A TRAFFIC PATTERN FOR RUNWAY 26. WHILE ESTABLISHING THE APPROACH, THE PILOT REALIZED THAT THE NOSE GEAR HAD SEPARATED AND THE LEFT RUDDER PEDAL WAS STUCK ON THE FLOOR, AND HE HAD NO RUDDER CONTROL. ON THE SECOND LANDING ATTEMPT HE SHUT DOWN THE ENGINE AND THE PROPELLER STOPPED HORIZONTALLY. THE PILOT HELD THE NOSE OFF AS LONG AS POSSIBLE. HE STATED THAT WHEN THE NOSE WHEEL TOUCHED DOWN, THE AIRCRAFT VEERED OFF THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY, AND NOSED OVER IN THE SOD AREA NEXT TO THE RUNWAY. (.4) ACCORDING TO THE PILOT, DURING THE FLARE TO TOUCHDOWN PHASE OF THE APPROACH, THE AIRPLANE DROPPED ONTO THE RUNWAY. AS THE AIRPLANE TOUCHED DOWN, THE PILOT FELT AND HEARD THE NOSE GEAR ASSEMBLY COLLAPSE. AFTER THE TOUCHDOWN, THE PILOT APPLIED POWER AND EXECUTED A GO-AROUND. WHILE THE PILOT MANEUVERED FOR THE SECOND APPROACH, HE NOTED THAT THE LEFT RUDDER PEDAL WAS STUCK ON THE FLOOR AND HE DID NOT HAVE TOTAL RUDDER CONTROL. AFTER THE LANDING, THE PILOT HELD THE NOSE OFF THE RUNWAY AS LONG AS POSSIBLE. WHEN THE NOSE SECTION TOUCHED DOWN, THE AIRPLANE VEERED OFF THE RUNWAY, AND NOSED OVER IN THE SOD AREA NEXT TO THE RUNWAY. EXAMINATION OF THE AIRPLANE FAILED TO DISCLOSE A MECHANICAL PROBLEM, NOR DID THE PILOT REPORT A MECHANICAL PROBLEM. ACCORDING TO THE FIXED BASE OPERATOR, THE WINDS WERE SHIFTING BETWEEN 300 AND 010 DEGREES AS THE PILOT ATTEMPTED THE FIRST LANDING.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N105AT · 4

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.