20040216003139A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 210E · Pittsburgh, PA · February 16, 2004

Date
February 16, 2004 · 14:26 local
Place
Pittsburgh, PA
Airport
Allegheny County
Phase of flight
Level Off Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N4974U
NTSB investigation
NTSBIAD04LA011
Reported as
Cessna 210E
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
5,450 total2,700 in this make and model40 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Airworthiness directive (AD) 76-14-07/R2 applies to the aircraft's main landing gear saddles (left and right main gear). This AD has two basic parts, (replacement of the saddles and an annual dye penetrant inspection of the new saddles). The initial replacement of the saddles was complied with, but the annual requirement to do a dye penetrant inspection of the saddles was never recorded nor was an amoc. The left main landing gear saddle failed at the location identified in the AD for the dye penetrant inspections. The area of the saddle that failed showed water-marking signs in the metal. This failure occurred during a gear extension for landing. The left gear was unable to achieved the down and locked position. The pilot could see the left gear was not completely extended and the unsafe light verified this. The pilot elected to land with the nose and right main gear down and locked causing damage to the left fuselage belly, left wing tip, left elevator and the left vertical stabilizer.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) 76-14-07/R2 APPLIES TO THE AIRCRAFT'S MAIN LANDING GEAR SADDLES (LEFT AND RIGHT MAIN GEAR). THIS AD HAS TWO BASIC PARTS, (REPLACEMENT OF THE SADDLES AND AN ANNUAL DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION OF THE NEW SADDLES). THE INITIAL REPLACEMENT OF THE SADDLES WAS COMPLIED WITH, BUT THE ANNUAL REQUIREMENT TO DO A DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION OF THE SADDLES WAS NEVER RECORDED NOR WAS AN AMOC. THE LEFT MAIN LANDING GEAR SADDLE FAILED AT THE LOCATION IDENTIFIED IN THE AD FOR THE DYE PENETRANT INSPECTIONS. THE AREA OF THE SADDLE THAT FAILED SHOWED WATER-MARKING SIGNS IN THE METAL. THIS FAILURE OCCURRED DURING A GEAR EXTENSION FOR LANDING. THE LEFT GEAR WAS UNABLE TO ACHIEVED THE DOWN AND LOCKED POSITION. THE PILOT COULD SEE THE LEFT GEAR WAS NOT COMPLETELY EXTENDED AND THE UNSAFE LIGHT VERIFIED THIS. THE PILOT ELECTED TO LAND WITH THE NOSE AND RIGHT MAIN GEAR DOWN AND LOCKED CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE LEFT FUSELAGE BELLY, LEFT WING TIP, LEFT ELEVATOR AND THE LEFT VERTICAL STABILIZER.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N4974U · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.