20150527010969I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Beech C24R · Chino, CA · May 27, 2015

Date
May 27, 2015 · 14:30 local
Place
Chino, CA
Airport
Chino Airport
Phase of flight
Landing: Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N6698F
Reported as
Beech C24R
Reported engine
Lycoming I0360 SER A&C
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Airline transport, flight instructor
Pilot’s flight hours
19,000 total150 in this make and model150 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

While conducting a local training flight with a flight instructor and a primary (student) pilot on board, the aircraft was landed with the landing gear in the up position. The flight originated at the corona, CA. Airport (ajo) where the instructor was having the student perform short field take-offs and landings. Once those tasks were completed, the aircraft departed to Chino, CA. Airport (cno) for additional training.

The normal routine from ajo is to enter left downwind for runways 26L at cno. However, this day, the aircraft was instructed to enter left base. While on base leg, traffic was pointed out to the instructor and student. The instructor told the student to configure the aircraft for landing and that he would look for traffic. As the aircraft was turning toward final, additional traffic on 26R was called out by ATC.

With the instructor attention outside looking for traffic, the student was instructed the task of flying the aircraft and completing the before landing checklist. With the out of normal traffic pattern entry, the crowed traffic pattern, busy radio communications, and the instructor?s attention diverted outside the aircraft, the student pilot failed to deploy the landing gear and run the gumps checklist.

The instructor also states that once on final he did check the landing gear lights, but glare from sun must have made the lights appear be illuminated green. Additionally, the student and flight instructor have indicated that the gear horn did not sound as designed.

As the FAA filed it

WHILE CONDUCTING A LOCAL TRAINING FLIGHT WITH A FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR AND A PRIMARY (STUDENT) PILOT ON BOARD, THE AIRCRAFT WAS LANDED WITH THE LANDING GEAR IN THE UP POSITION. THE FLIGHT ORIGINATED AT THE CORONA, CA. AIRPORT (AJO) WHERE THE INSTRUCTOR WAS HAVING THE STUDENT PERFORM SHORT FIELD TAKE-OFFS AND LANDINGS. ONCE THOSE TASKS WERE COMPLETED, THE AIRCRAFT DEPARTED TO CHINO, CA. AIRPORT (CNO) FOR ADDITIONAL TRAINING.

THE NORMAL ROUTINE FROM AJO IS TO ENTER LEFT DOWNWIND FOR RUNWAYS 26L AT CNO. HOWEVER, THIS DAY, THE AIRCRAFT WAS INSTRUCTED TO ENTER LEFT BASE. WHILE ON BASE LEG, TRAFFIC WAS POINTED OUT TO THE INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT. THE INSTRUCTOR TOLD THE STUDENT TO CONFIGURE THE AIRCRAFT FOR LANDING AND THAT HE WOULD LOOK FOR TRAFFIC. AS THE AIRCRAFT WAS TURNING TOWARD FINAL, ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ON 26R WAS CALLED OUT BY ATC.

WITH THE INSTRUCTOR ATTENTION OUTSIDE LOOKING FOR TRAFFIC, THE STUDENT WAS INSTRUCTED THE TASK OF FLYING THE AIRCRAFT AND COMPLETING THE BEFORE LANDING CHECKLIST. WITH THE OUT OF NORMAL TRAFFIC PATTERN ENTRY, THE CROWED TRAFFIC PATTERN, BUSY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS, AND THE INSTRUCTOR?S ATTENTION DIVERTED OUTSIDE THE AIRCRAFT, THE STUDENT PILOT FAILED TO DEPLOY THE LANDING GEAR AND RUN THE GUMPS CHECKLIST.

THE INSTRUCTOR ALSO STATES THAT ONCE ON FINAL HE DID CHECK THE LANDING GEAR LIGHTS, BUT GLARE FROM SUN MUST HAVE MADE THE LIGHTS APPEAR BE ILLUMINATED GREEN. ADDITIONALLY, THE STUDENT AND FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR HAVE INDICATED THAT THE GEAR HORN DID NOT SOUND AS DESIGNED.

Other reports on N6698F · 4

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.