ERA21LA307

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 150 · Carrollton, AL · July 1, 2021

Accident · No injuriesClass 4 · LimitedFinal report
Date
July 1, 2021, 13:00 local (18:00 UTC)
Place
Carrollton, AL
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Enroute
Aircraft
N561QLCessna 150
Defining event
Enroute-cruise: Fuel exhaustion
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 4 - Basic report with no Prelim publish
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
FAA report
20210701012439A
Case key
103580

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot’s incorrect preflight planning and poor in-flight planning, resulting in fuel exhaustion. Contributing to the damage was the inadvertent encounter with a hole during the forced landing.

Findings · 5

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Planning/preparation: fuel planningPersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotCessna 150H: 4 casesAll aircraft: 719 casesProbable cause
Fluids: fuelAircraft › Fluids/misc hardware · Incorrect use/operationCessna 150H: 5 casesAll aircraft: 1,695 casesProbable cause
Fluids: fuelAircraft › Fluids/misc hardware · Fluid levelCessna 150H: 5 casesAll aircraft: 1,695 casesProbable cause
TerrainEnvironmental issues › Physical environment · Contributed to outcomeCessna 150H: 2 casesAll aircraft: 267 cases

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

Earlier that day, the pilot had flown the airplane on three flights with no airframe or engine issues reported. Prior to the accident flight, he used a dipstick to determine the total quantity of fuel in the left and right fuel tanks, noting they contained 4 gallons and 3 gallons, respectively. He added that the total amount did not account for the unusable fuel amount, which according to the airplane Type Certificate Data Sheet totaled 3.5 gallons. After takeoff with about 3.5 gallons of usable fuel on-board for the flight requiring 4 gallons, the flight climbed to 2,500 ft mean sea level where the pilot leaned the fuel to air ratio and proceeded towards the destination, with slight deviation due to weather while en route. He reported that as the flight continued, he knew he was low on fuel and when south of a nearby airport, he looked at his fuel gauges and in hindsight knew he should have landed there. He elected to continue, and after flying about 35 minutes, he “ran out of [fuel] 8 miles before [he] got there.” About the time of the loss of engine power the left fuel gauge was indicating more than 1/2 gallon and the right fuel gauge indicated empty, but they were lower than he had ever seen them. After experiencing a loss of engine power, he spotted a field below and performed S-turns and slips but landed faster than he liked. While at a slow speed, the nose landing gear rolled into a hole causing it to separate. The airplane came to rest upright with the tail elevated. The pilot, who was also an airframe and powerplant mechanic, reported that following the accident he drained the fuel strainer and only 2 ounces were recovered. He also drained a little over 1/2 gallon of fuel from the left fuel tank and no fuel from the right fuel tank. On the submitted NTSB Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident/Incident Report and also verbally, he indicated there was nothing mechanically wrong with the airframe or engine that caused the fuel exhaustion. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) received a report of damage to the airplane and inspected it on July 28, 2021; prior to this the event was not reported. Extensive damage to the engine mount was noted which constituted substantial damage. With no fuel in the fuel tanks and electrical power applied, the left fuel gauge was reading slightly above empty while the right fuel gauge was reading empty.

Aircraft

Registration
N561QL
Reported as
Cessna 150 (H)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
15069155
Built
1968
Airframe hours
3,793.4
Engine
Continental O-200-A, 100 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Registered owner
Schrock Aircraft Service LLC
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Utility
Last inspection
Annual · June 25, 2021
Departed
MPE · Philadelphia, MS
Destination
3M8 · Reform, AL
Flight plan
VFR
Equipment
Stall warning system, Electronic flight bag or handheld device

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
63
Injuries
None
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Medical
Class 2, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
June 6, 2020
Seat
Left
Restraint
Lap only
Flight hours
433 total · 100 in this make and model
Role
Pilot-rated passenger
Age
29
Injuries
None
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Medical
Class 3, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
December 28, 2020
Seat
Right
Restraint
Lap only
Flight hours
3 total

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
220° at 8 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
88 °F, dew point 75 °F
Altimeter
30.00 inHg
Observed at
KGTR, 24 nm away
METAR
METAR KGTR 011756Z 22008KT 10SM FEW034 31/24 A3000 RMK AO2 SLP163 6//// T03110239 10311 20228 58014 PNO $=

Docket · 6

The files NTSB released with the investigation on January 11, 2022, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.

Other investigations on N561QL · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.