AD 2000-22-20

Airworthiness directive · Flap Idler Hinge Fitting · Boeing DC-9-11, DC-9-12, DC-9-13 and 15 more

Effective
November 29, 2000
Published
November 14, 2000 · 65 FR 68067–68069
Issued
November 1, 2000
Models
DC-9-11, DC-9-12, DC-9-13, DC-9-14, DC-9-15, DC-9-15F and 12 more
Data sheet
TCDSA6WE
Registered aircraft
13 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Large airplane
Amendment
39-11968
Docket
2000-NM-344-AD
Issued as
Final rule; request for comments

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 00-28480. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.

On this page

Summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes. This action requires, among other actions, measuring the diameter of the hole counterbore of the outboard idler hinge fitting of the left and right wing flap; performing repetitive high frequency eddy current inspections (HFEC) to detect cracks at the flap idler hinge fitting, if necessary; and replacing the flap idler hinge fitting with a new like part, if any crack is detected. This action is necessary to prevent failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting due to fatigue cracking, which could result in a deflected flap that may cause an asymmetric lift and consequent reduced controllability and structural integrity of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.

The airworthiness directive

2000-22-20 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-11968. Docket 2000-NM-344-AD.

Applicability: Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes, as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-57A218, dated September 20, 2000; certificated in any category.

Note 1:

This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting due to fatigue cracking, which could result in a deflected flap that may cause an asymmetric lift and consequent reduced controllability and structural integrity of the airplane, accomplish the following:

(a) Measurement

PDF page 3

(a) Before the accumulation of 24,000 total landings, or within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, measure the diameter of the hole counterbore of the outboard idler hinge fitting of the left and right wing flap, per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-57A218, including Appendix, dated September 20, 2000.

Acceptable Measurement of 0.875 (\7/8\) Inch: Installation of Certain Parts

PDF page 3

(1) If the diameter of any hole counterbore is 0.875 (\7/8\) inch, before further flight, install a new nut, plain washer, and PLI washer, per the service bulletin.

Unacceptable Measurement of 1.125 (1\1/8\) Inches: Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions, If Necessary

PDF page 3

(2) If the diameter of any hole counterbore is 1.125 (1\1/8\) inches, before further flight, do a high frequency eddy current inspection (HFEC) to detect cracks at the flap idler hinge fitting, per the service bulletin.

(i) Condition 1. If no crack is detected, before further flight, install a new nut, plain washer, and PLI washer, per the service bulletin. Repeat the HFEC inspection every 1,000 landings until the replacement specified in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) has been done.

(ii) Condition 2. If any crack is detected, before further flight, replace the flap idler hinge fitting with a new like part, per the service bulletin. Within 24,000 landings after accomplishment of the replacement, do the HFEC inspection required by paragraph (a)(2) of this AD.

(b) Alternative Methods of Compliance

PDF page 3

(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.

Note 2:

Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.

(c) Special Flight Permits

PDF page 3

(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(d) Incorporation by Reference

PDF page 3

(d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-57A218, including Appendix, dated September 20, 2000. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(e) Effective Date

PDF page 3

(e) This amendment becomes effective on November 29, 2000.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 1

Effective November 29, 2000.

The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of November 29, 2000.

Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or before January 16, 2001.

AddressesPage 1

Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-NM-344-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Comments may be submitted via fax to (425) 227-1232. Comments may also be sent via the Internet using the following address: 9-anm-iarcomment@faa.gov. Comments sent via fax or the Internet must contain “Docket No. 2000-NM-344-AD” in the subject line and need not be submitted in triplicate. Comments sent via the Internet as attached electronic files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Windows or ASCII text.

The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Boeing

Commercial Aircraft Group, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

For further information contactPage 2

Wahib Mina, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5324; fax (562) 627-5210.

Supplementary informationPage 2

The FAA has received reports of a failed or cracked flap idler hinge fitting at the lower outboard stud location on certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9 series airplanes. Investigation revealed that these discrepancies were caused by fatigue cracking initiating at the lower outboard mounting hole with a 1 1/8 -inch diameter counterbore. Such fatigue cracking, if not corrected, could result in failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting. A failed outboard flap idler hinge fitting could result in a deflected flap, which may cause an asymmetric lift and consequent reduced controllability and structural integrity of the airplane.

Explanation of Relevant Service InformationPage 2

The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-57A218, including Appendix, dated September 20, 2000, which describes the following procedures:

1. Measuring the diameter of the hole counterbore of the outboard idler hinge fitting of the left and right wing flap;

2. Installing a new nut, plain washer, and PLI washer;

3. For certain cases, performing repetitive high frequency eddy current inspections (HFEC) to detect cracks at the flap idler hinge fitting; and

4. Replacing the flap idler hinge fitting with a new like part, if any crack is detected.

Accomplishment of the actions specified in the service bulletin is intended to adequately address the identified unsafe condition.

Explanation of the Requirements of the RulePage 2

Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -9-20, -9-30, -9-40, and -9-50 series airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes series airplanes of the same type design, this AD is being issued to prevent failure of the outboard flap idler hinge fitting due to fatigue cracking, which could result in a deflected flap that may cause an asymmetric lift and consequent reduced controllability and structural integrity of the airplane. This AD requires accomplishment of the actions specified in the service bulletin described previously.

Determination of Rule's Effective DatePage 2

Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Comments invitedPage 2

Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed.

Submit comments using the following format:

• Organize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a request to change the compliance time and a request to change the service bulletin reference as two separate issues.

• For each issue, state what specific change to the AD is being requested.

• Include justification ( e.g., reasons or data) for each request.

Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.

Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: “Comments to Docket Number 2000-NM-344-AD.” The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.

Regulatory impactPage 2

The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.

The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe condition in aircraft, and that it is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

Adoption of the amendmentPage 2

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 13

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Mcdonnell Douglas8 aircraft
  • Douglas5 aircraft
By year built
19661970
Registered aircraft by year built: 8 aircraft
19661
19674
19692
19701

5 with no year recorded

By model

Aircraft