What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23)Upon landing on runway 27 at hgr the pilot encounter a 22 knot gust of wind out of 300 and hard on the nose landing gear upward about 18 inches damaging all the structure in the nose of the aircraft up to include the upper windshield frame. (.4) the pilot requested and was cleared for the ILS runway 27 approach. While on final, the airplane encountered light to occasional moderate turbulence, and required a 30-40 degree drift correction to maintain course. When the airplane was 2 miles from the runway, the tower controller reported the wind as 300 degrees at 18 knots. The pilot continued the approach and 100 to 50 feet above the ground felt the crosswind "dramatically" subside. The pilot was then able to maintain runway alignment with no wind correction. The landing phase continued without incident until the airplane was 3-5 feet above the runway. The pilot then felt a "significant and abrupt" buffeting of the airplane. The airplane "weather-vaned" to the right, rolled left, and started to drift left of the centerline. The pilot applied corrective action; however, the airplane touched down nose wheel first, bounced back int o the air, and then touched down nose wheel first again. The nose gear collapsed and the propellers contacted the runway.
As the FAA filed it
(-23)UPON LANDING ON RUNWAY 27 AT HGR THE PILOT ENCOUNTER A 22 KNOT GUST OF WIND OUT OF 300 AND HARD ON THE NOSE LANDING GEAR UPWARD ABOUT 18 INCHES DAMAGING ALL THE STRUCTURE IN THE NOSE OF THE AIRCRAFT UP TO INCLUDE THE UPPER WINDSHIELD FRAME. (.4) THE PILOT REQUESTED AND WAS CLEARED FOR THE ILS RUNWAY 27 APPROACH. WHILE ON FINAL, THE AIRPLANE ENCOUNTERED LIGHT TO OCCASIONAL MODERATE TURBULENCE, AND REQUIRED A 30-40 DEGREE DRIFT CORRECTION TO MAINTAIN COURSE. WHEN THE AIRPLANE WAS 2 MILES FROM THE RUNWAY, THE TOWER CONTROLLER REPORTED THE WIND AS 300 DEGREES AT 18 KNOTS. THE PILOT CONTINUED THE APPROACH AND 100 TO 50 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND FELT THE CROSSWIND "DRAMATICALLY" SUBSIDE. THE PILOT WAS THEN ABLE TO MAINTAIN RUNWAY ALIGNMENT WITH NO WIND CORRECTION. THE LANDING PHASE CONTINUED WITHOUT INCIDENT UNTIL THE AIRPLANE WAS 3-5 FEET ABOVE THE RUNWAY. THE PILOT THEN FELT A "SIGNIFICANT AND ABRUPT" BUFFETING OF THE AIRPLANE. THE AIRPLANE "WEATHER-VANED" TO THE RIGHT, ROLLED LEFT, AND STARTED TO DRIFT LEFT OF THE CENTERLINE. THE PILOT APPLIED CORRECTIVE ACTION; HOWEVER, THE AIRPLANE TOUCHED DOWN NOSE WHEEL FIRST, BOUNCED BACK INT O THE AIR, AND THEN TOUCHED DOWN NOSE WHEEL FIRST AGAIN. THE NOSE GEAR COLLAPSED AND THE PROPELLERS CONTACTED THE RUNWAY.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N55134 · 4
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.